Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Anesthesiology. 2013 Dec;119(6):1402–1409. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182a9b0c1

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Group averages and SD for (A) end-inspiratory lung volume (EILV) versus positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP); (B) EILV versus peak inspiratory pressure (PIP). Values obtained during both ascending and descending PEEP ramps are displayed with solid and dashed lines, respectively. Two-way ANOVA for changing PEEP: *P < 0.001; for type of ramp (ascending vs. descending): P < 0.001. Paired t test for PEEP 0 versus 9 cm H2O: ‡P < 0.001. The area under the curve subtended by EILV was larger in the descending than in the ascending PEEP ramp (P < 0.01).