Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 15;9(4):e95091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095091

Table 1. Evaluation of stress response in the congenic strains.

Strain
Parameters SHRSP SPwch1.71 SPwch1.72 WKY
BP (mmHg) 213±31 (4) 209±19 (4) 212±24 (4) 111±10*(6)
ΔBP (mmHg), Restraint 22.4±11.8 (4) 33.8±8.1 (4) 2.0±3.3*(4) 4.1±5.7*(6)
Cold 34.4±4.3 (4) 48.1±17.7 (4) 15.7±6.1*(4) 17.3±8.1*(6)
HR (bpm) 331±71 (3) 272±21 (4) 348±40 (4) 343±18 (6)
ΔHR (bpm), Restraint 67.2±18.4 (3) 100.1±20.9 (4) 102.1±10.9*(4) 33.3±20.3*(6)
Cold 179.0±32.6 (3) 189.2±27.0 (4) 96.9±60.0 (4) 127.1±20.0*(6)
ΔLF/HF, Restraint 3.38±0.51 (5) 3.35±1.00 (5) 1.92±1.11*(5) 0.34±0.30*(5)
ΔNE (µmol), Cold 0.572±0.096 (10) 0.596±0.061 (10) 0.341±0.046*(10) 0.173±0.069*(16)

Baseline blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), increase in BP (ΔBP), HR (ΔHR), LF/HF (ΔLF/HF, a parameter for the relative sympathetic activity), and changes in urinary norepinephrine excretion (ΔNE) under cold and restraint stress in SHRSP were compared with those in SPwch1.71,SPwch1.72 and WKY [5]. The numbers of rats used for each analysis are shown in parentheses. *P<0.05 vs. SHRSP by Dunnett’s post-hoc test.