Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 1.

Published in final edited form as: Youth Soc. 2012 Feb 15;46(3):425–440. doi: 10.1177/0044118X12436700

Table 3.

Logistic regression results and odds ratios predicting hazard probabilities for transitioning to cohabitation or marriage

Variable	Cohabitation			Marriage
Variable	β	SE	OR	β	SE	OR
Race	−.174	.172	.840	.169	.186	1.18
Gender	.071	.118	1.07	−.229	.123	.795
Family Structure	−.086	.144	.918	−.011	.153	.989
Parent’s Income	−.013	.026	.987	−.022	.027	.978
Nativity	.520	.308	1.68	−.046	.327	.955
Importance of Marriage	−.005	.106	.995	.320	.118	1.38^**
Expectation to Marry	−.169	.127	.845	−.138	.134	.871
Expected Timing	−.002	.022	.998	−.063	.023	.939^**

^*

p < .05;

^**

p < .01