Figure 2.

Endogenous Cuing of Visual Attention Influences Processing of Target, but Not Cursor, Information

(A) Sensitivity (d′) to distinguish between brightness increases and decreases during the perception task for nonchannel trials (50% of trials), depending on whether the change occurred on the cued (attended) or noncued (not attended) side.

(B) Average response strength in the force channels around response onset. Attention had a large effect (d = 1.02) on response strength to target perturbations (t₁₈ = 4.43, p < 0.001), but only a small (d = 0.16) and insignificant (t₁₃ = 0.69, p > 0.5) effect on the response strength to cursor perturbations.

(C) Response onsets to the visual perturbations. The statistical interaction test failed to reach significance (F_1,18 = 0.919, p = 0.350).

All error bars denote 1 SEM among participants. ^∗p < 0.05, ^∗∗∗p < 0.001.