Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Genet. 2014 Feb;46(2):100–106. doi: 10.1038/ng.2876

Figure 2. Effectiveness of MLM using MR random or MT top associated markers in correcting for stratification.

Figure 2

We report the average λmedian (± standard error) in 100 simulations with population stratification based on N=10,000 samples, M=100,000 markers, two discrete subpopulations with FST=0.005, and a mean trait difference of 0.25 standard deviations between subpopulations. Calibration of small P-values is reported in Supplementary Table 4.