Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr;15(4):365–374. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1300263

Table 2.

Grain yield, straw and root dry weight (DW), and harvest index of rice under different water regimes and Zn source treatments

Genotype Zn treatment Grain yield (g/pot)
Straw DW (g/pot)
Root DW (g/pot)
Harvest index (%)
CF AWD CF AWD CF AWD CF AWD
Nipponbare Control 29.9c 33.4c 55.4b 60.2c 6.9c 7.6c 35.1c 34.9b
ZnSO4 38.6a 44.2a 61.0a 71.3a 7.9a 9.4a 40.7a 38.3a
Zn-EDTA 36.0b 39.6b 57.0a 66.1b 7.3b 8.4b 37.1b 39.4a
Mean 34.8A 39.1A 57.8A 65.9A 7.3A 8.5A 37.6A 37.5A
Jiaxing27 Control 27.4c 29.6c 48.9b 51.0b 6.2c 6.7c 35.9b 35.5b
ZnSO4 34.5a 38.9a 60.0a 65.7a 7.4a 8.6a 37.9a 38.7a
Zn-EDTA 32.7b 36.1b 56.4a 61.7a 7.0b 8.0b 36.8ab 36.8ab
Mean 31.5B 34.9B 55.1A 59.4B 6.9B 7.7B 36.9A 37.0A

Within a column, means followed by different letters are significantly different at P<0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test. Lower-case and upper-case letters indicate comparisons among three Zn treatments and between two genotypes, respectively