Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Autism Res. 2014 Mar 11;7(2):264–272. doi: 10.1002/aur.1362

Figure 2. NL3R451C Mutants Exhibit Increased Spatial Learning in the Morris Water Maze Task.

Figure 2

(A–C) NL3R451C mice exhibit increased spatial learning in the Morris water maze during training compared to WT littermates using both latency (N=20 littermate pairs) (A) and distance travelled (N=20 littermate pairs) (B) prior to reaching the hidden platform. (C) Average swim speed did not differ between WT and NL3R451C during training trials (N=20 littermate pairs). (D) NL3R451C mice spent less time swimming near the wall of the water maze (thigmotaxis) compared to WT littermates during training trials (N=20 littermate pairs). (E) WT and NL3R451C mice both show a statistically significant preference for the Target quadrant over other quadrants during a probe trial (N=19 littermate pairs; 1 littermate pair was removed because 1 mouse was considered a “floater”). (F) Using the measure of platform location crossing, NL3R451C mice displayed an increase in crossings of the target platform location during the probe trial when compared to their WT littermates (N=19 littermate pairs). (G) All mice performed equivalently on the visible platform version of the Morris water maze (N=20 littermate pairs). (H) When platform location was reversed and mice were re-trained, WT and NL3R451C mice acquire the reversal learning task equally well (N=15 littermate pairs). (I-J) No difference in spatial preference was observed during the probe trial on either time spent in quadrant measure (I) or number of platform crossings measure (J). *P<0.05, **P<0.01 ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001