Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin J Pain. 2014 Jun;30(6):536–543. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000020

Table 3.

Mean PADS scores with standard deviations in parentheses during sham and active stimuli across time segments

Stimulus Condition
Sham Active
Segment 1 (baseline) 4.45 (2.74) 4.44 (2.78)
Segment 2 (stimulus) 4.80 (2.69) 5.86 (3.11)*
Segment 3 (recovery) 4.22 (2.50) 4.24 (2.76)
*

p < .05

PADS possible range (0–40; ten 4 point items); note: given that 4 of 5 stimuli were likely sub-threshold nociceptive it would be unlikely to observe PADS scores in the extremely high range; it was also likely there was a de facto range restriction given that most of the scoring for PADS was derived from facial change thus limiting the number of items and restricting range.