Table 2.
Assessment of structural diversity, relative shares of park characteristics, and visitors’ activities
| Berlin | Salzburg | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KP | EB | CHU | MP | DP | LP | |
| Structural diversity | ||||||
| Tree/forest elements | ± | − | ± | ± | +++ | − |
| Ground vegetation | − | − | − | − | +++ | + |
| Water elements | − | ± | +++ | − | ± | − |
| Topography | −− | ± | ++ | − | ± | ± |
| Active infrastr. | − | −− | − | + | +++ | ± |
| Passive infrastr. | ± | ± | −− | + | ± | +++ |
| Park characteristics | ||||||
| Attractive wildlife | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.56 | 0.71 |
| Attractive plants | 0.75 | 0.83 | 0.79 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.73 |
| Naturalness | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 0.93 | 0.87 |
| Beauty of landscape | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 0.76 | 0.75 |
| Good view | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 0.54 | 0.59 |
| Tranquility | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 0.79 | 0.79 |
| Facilities for relaxation | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.70 | 0.68 |
| Facilities for sport and play | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 0.58 | 0.72 |
| Access | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.82 | 0.90 | 0.76 | 0.76 |
| Proximity to water | 0.69 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.64 | n.a. | n.a. |
| Shaded areas | 0.85 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.86 | n.a. | n.a. |
| Activities (%) | ||||||
| Active/sport | 6.82 | 2.04 | 10.42 | 4.00 | 75.00 | 47.00 |
| Passive/relax | 93.18 | 97.96 | 89.58 | 96.00 | 25.00 | 53.00 |
Structural diversity values range from low to high represented with—as low and +++ as high (in each category values between the mean and 0.5 × standard deviation are presented as ±; values < or >0.5 × standard deviation around the mean are presented as − or +; values < or >1 standard deviation around the mean are presented as ++ or − and values < or >1.5 × standard deviation around the mean are presented as +++ or −−−). Park characteristics are normalized to 0–1, ranging from “not important” to “very important”
n.a. not assessed in this park