Table 1.
AT AML DIAGNOSIS PRIOR TO TREATMENT (n = 16) | |
Median age (years) | 64 (Range, 36–75) |
Cytogenetic risk category at diagnosis | |
Unfavorable | 9 (56%) |
Intermediate | 7 (44%) |
Favorable | 0 |
% Blasts in bone marrow at AML diagnosis | 64 (Range, 38–93) |
NEWLY DIAGNOSED AML PATIENT WHO RECEIVED INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY (n = 9) | |
Median age (years) | 57 (Range, 36–70) |
Cytogenetic risk category at diagnosis | |
Unfavorable | 7 (64%) |
Intermediate | 4 (36%) |
Favorable | 0 |
% Blasts in bone marrow at AML diagnosis | 72 (Range, 52–93) |
AML PATIENTS IN CR DURING CONSOLIDATION THERAPY (n = 10) | |
Median age (years) | 51 (Range, 28–65) |
Cytogenetic risk category at diagnosis | |
Unfavorable | 2 (20%) |
Intermediate | 8 (80%) |
Favorable | 0 |
% Blasts in bone marrow at AML diagnosis | 53 (Range, 21–83) |
AML PATIENT IN CR IN LONG REMISSION AFTER CONSOLIDATION THERAPY (n = 5) | |
Median age (years) | 46 (Range, 33–59) |
Cytogenetic risk category at diagnosis | |
Unfavorable | 0 |
Intermediate | 4 (80%) |
Favorable | 1 (20%) |
% Blasts in bone marrow at AML diagnosis | 67 (Range, 50–82) |