Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 10;5:160. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00160

Table 1.

Characteristics of AML patients included in this study.

AT AML DIAGNOSIS PRIOR TO TREATMENT (n = 16)
Median age (years) 64 (Range, 36–75)
Cytogenetic risk category at diagnosis
Unfavorable 9 (56%)
Intermediate 7 (44%)
Favorable 0
% Blasts in bone marrow at AML diagnosis 64 (Range, 38–93)
NEWLY DIAGNOSED AML PATIENT WHO RECEIVED INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY (n = 9)
Median age (years) 57 (Range, 36–70)
Cytogenetic risk category at diagnosis
Unfavorable 7 (64%)
Intermediate 4 (36%)
Favorable 0
% Blasts in bone marrow at AML diagnosis 72 (Range, 52–93)
AML PATIENTS IN CR DURING CONSOLIDATION THERAPY (n = 10)
Median age (years) 51 (Range, 28–65)
Cytogenetic risk category at diagnosis
Unfavorable 2 (20%)
Intermediate 8 (80%)
Favorable 0
% Blasts in bone marrow at AML diagnosis 53 (Range, 21–83)
AML PATIENT IN CR IN LONG REMISSION AFTER CONSOLIDATION THERAPY (n = 5)
Median age (years) 46 (Range, 33–59)
Cytogenetic risk category at diagnosis
Unfavorable 0
Intermediate 4 (80%)
Favorable 1 (20%)
% Blasts in bone marrow at AML diagnosis 67 (Range, 50–82)