Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Aging. 2014 Feb 6;35(7):1549–1561. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.01.144

Table 4.

Variance in cognition explained by linear models.

Cognitive domain

Factors included
in model
Episodic
Memory
Semantic
Memory
Working
Memory
Perceptual
Speed
Visuospatial
Ability
Demographics only 4.7% 2.2% 2.7% 5.5% 10.6%
Demographics + AD 23.6 14.4 14.3 12.4 16.6
Demographics + gross infarcts 6.8 5.0 5.1 7.6 10.7
Demographics + micro infarcts 5.0 2.8 3.1 7.1 10.7
Demographics + HS 12.5 10.4 4.7 10.1 12.4
Demographics + Lewy bodies 5.7 2.9 3.4 6.1 11.5
Demographics + all pathology 31.8 24.0 18.2 19.6 18.2
Demographics + all pathology + ROI T2 f 37.3 32.8 25.9 NA g NA g

Additional variance in cognition explained by ROI T2 5.5 8.8 7.7 NA g NA g

All values are percentages. Each cognitive domain was assessed separately.

f

ROI T2 means the average value of T2 calculated over all voxels within a cluster detected as having significant association of cognition with T2 for a given domain. T2 for each ROI was included as a separate factor in the model.

g

Not applicable; there were no clusters detected as having significant associations of cognition with T2 for these domains.