Table IV.
Comparison of published reports of primary breast diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
Reference Study type | N | Median follow-up (years) | EFS/DFS/PFS | OS | CNS relapse |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Avilés et al. (2005) Prospective, single centre: Chemo vs RT vs ChemoRT | 96 | 13.8 | 83% (10-year EFS in chemoRT arm) | 76% (10-year OS in chemoRT arm) | 11% |
Ryan et al. (2008) Retrospective, multicentre | 204 | 5.5 | 54% (5-year PFS) | 63% (5-year OS) | 5% |
Jeanneret-Sozzi et al. (2008) Retrospective, multicentre | 51† | 1.8 | 36% (5-year DFS) | 42% (5-year OS) | 14% |
Yhim et al. (2010)* Retrospective, multicentre | 49‡ | 3.5 | 65% (5-year DFS) | 74% (5-year OS) | 10% |
Avilés et al. (2012)* Retrospective, single centre | 104 | 6.5 | 60% (5-year DFS) | 53% (5year OS) | NR |
Avilés et al. (2007) Retrospective, single centre | 32 | 5.4 | 75% (3-year EFS) | 63% (3-year OS) | 0 |
Current study* Retrospective, multicentre | 76 | 4.5 | 66% (5-year PFS) | 75% (5-year OS) | 16% |
Survival data presented for the 51 cases of high-grade lymphoma, because multiple histologies were included
Survival data presented for the 49 cases that met criteria for primary breast diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, because advanced stage cases were included
Included patients treated with rituximab
Abbreviations: CNS: Central Nervous System; DFS: Disease-Free Survival; EFS: Event-Free Survival; NR: Not Reported; OS: Overall Survival; PFS: Progression-free survival; RT: Radiation Therapy.