Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 10.
Published in final edited form as: J Control Release. 2013 Jul 3;171(1):38–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.06.032

Table 2.

Tissue clearance rates for curcumin and MCC80

Group Time (h) Mass (nmol) Mass (nmol/g tissue) %ID (nmol/nmol)
Curcumin 0* 158 765 59
2 98 ± 24 531 ± 81 36 ± 8.9
48& 0.67 ± 0.004 7.2 ± 1.3 0.25 ± 0.002
96 0.39 ± 0.12 2.8 ± 0.95 0.14 ± 0.04
MCC80 0* 90 1080 33
2 33 ± 8.1 280 ± 73 12 ± 3.0
48 3.5 ± 1.2 37 ± 10 1.3 ± 0.46
96 2.2 ± 0.32 15 ± 2.1 0.80 ± 0.12
*

=0 h validations were conducted for n=1 animals per group and not included in statistical analyses.

&

All other time points represent n = 3 animals per group (mean ± SEM), except where outliers were removed due to injection error (n = 2). There were no statistical differences between curcumin or MCC80 (one-way ANOVA, p = 0.2).