Table 2.
Tissue clearance rates for curcumin and MCC80
Group | Time (h) | Mass (nmol) | Mass (nmol/g tissue) | %ID (nmol/nmol) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Curcumin | 0* | 158 | 765 | 59 |
2 | 98 ± 24 | 531 ± 81 | 36 ± 8.9 | |
48& | 0.67 ± 0.004 | 7.2 ± 1.3 | 0.25 ± 0.002 | |
96 | 0.39 ± 0.12 | 2.8 ± 0.95 | 0.14 ± 0.04 | |
MCC80 | 0* | 90 | 1080 | 33 |
2 | 33 ± 8.1 | 280 ± 73 | 12 ± 3.0 | |
48 | 3.5 ± 1.2 | 37 ± 10 | 1.3 ± 0.46 | |
96 | 2.2 ± 0.32 | 15 ± 2.1 | 0.80 ± 0.12 |
=0 h validations were conducted for n=1 animals per group and not included in statistical analyses.
All other time points represent n = 3 animals per group (mean ± SEM), except where outliers were removed due to injection error (n = 2). There were no statistical differences between curcumin or MCC80 (one-way ANOVA, p = 0.2).