Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 20;8(2):198–215. doi: 10.1007/s12072-014-9523-y

Table 2.

Main characteristics of clinical interventions in Tac-based immunosuppressive regimens during liver transplantation

First author Year Study center Group No of patients (n) Etiology distribution (n) Intraoperative steroid usage Postoperative steroid duration Tac duration MMF duration Tac blood level (ng/mL)
HBV HCV HCC PSC/PBC Alcohol AIH 7 day 28 day 90 day
Comparison of Tac-based regimen with steroid or not (Sect. I)
 Langrehr [25] 2002 University of Berlin, Germany Tac + steroid 15 15 + 14 m
Tac + MMF 15 15 + One bolus
 Pelletier [26] 2005 University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA Tac + MMF + steroid 36 24 8 13 + 6 m 14.0 m 14 m
Tac + MMF 36 14 6 17 14.0 m 14 m
 Margarit [27] 2005 Universidad Autònoma Barcelona, Spain Tac + steroid 32 2 15 11 11 + 3 m 44.0 m 12.0 13.0 10.0
Tac 28 3 20 13 5 + 44.0 m 12.5 14.0 10.5
 Reggiani [17] 2005 Instituto di Ricovero e Cura a Caraterre Scientifico (IRCCS) Policlinico San Matteo, Italy Tac + MMF + steroid 18 12 1 1 + 3 m 31.0 m 31 m 11.0 12.0
Tac + MMF 12 2 0 2 31.0 m 31 m 14.8 11.0
 Junge [28] 2005 Charité Berlin Campus Virchow Klinikum, Germany Tac + steroid 14 14 3 m 24.0 m 24 m
Tac + MMF 16 16 24.0 m 24 m
 Chen [9] 2007 Tongji Medical College, China Tac + MMF + steroid 26 26 + 12 m 12.0 m 12 m
Tac + MMF 28 28 + 3 m 12.0 m 12 m
 Vivarelli [29] 2007 University of Bologna, Italy Tac + steroid 16 + 24 m 28.0 m 11.2 11.5 8.0
Tac 23 + 3 m 28.0 m 12.0 11.1 9.1
 Manousou [30] 2009 University College London, UK Azathioprine + steroid + Tac 49 49 13 6 m 53.5 m 8.4 7.0
Tac 54 54 17 53.5 m 8.0 8.0
 Weiler [31] 2010 Hospital of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany Tac + steroid 54 7 16 19 5 21 + 6 m 60.0 m
Tac 56 12 14 21 3 16 + 2w 60.0 m
Comparison of Tac-based regimen with induction agents or not (Sect. II)
 Eason [32] 2003 Ochsner Clinic Foundation, USA Tac + MMF + steroid 59 1 34 6 3 + 3 m 18.0 m 3 m
RATG + Tac + MMF 60 3 31 3 3 18.0 m 3 m
 Boillot [33] 2005 Hospital Edouard Herriot, France Tac + steroid 347 55 103 50 + 3 m 3.0 m 10.9
Daclizumab + Tac 351 63 106 53 + 3.0 m 10.6
 Spada [34] 2006 University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Italy Tac + steroid 36 + 6 m 24.0 m 7.8 9.3
Basiliximab + Tac 36 + 24.0 m 9.9 7.5
 Humar [35] 2007 University of Minnesota Minneapolis, USA Tac + MMF + steroid 83 42 + 6 m 32.0 m 3 m
Basiliximab + Tac + MMF 83 44 + 6d 16.1 m 3 m
 Kato [36] 2007 University of Miami School of Medicine, USA Tac/MMF + steroid 39 39 + 3 m 52.0 m 12 m
Daclizumab + Tac/MMF 31 31 52.0 m 12 m
 Gras [37] 2008 Luc University Clinics, Université Catholique de Louvain, Belgium Tac + steroid 34 4 + 60 m 60.0 m 11.8 8.8 7.7
Basiliximab + Tac 50 8 60.0 m 9.9 9.0 6.9
 Foroncewicz [18] 2009 Medical University of Warsaw, Poland Tac + steroid 18 2 2 5 2 + 72 m 72.0 m
Daclizumab + Tac 7 0 3 2 1 + 72.0 m
 Klintmalm [38] 2011 Baylor University Medical Center, USA Tac + MMF + steroid 72 72 + 20.9 m 20.9 m 20.9 m 11.1 11.1 11.1
Daclizumab + Tac + MMF 146 146 20.9 m 20.9 m 10.8 11.1 9.6

AIH autoimmune hepatitis, HBV hepatitis B virus, HCV hepatitis C virus, HCC hepatocellular carcinoma, MMF mycophenolate mofetil, PBC primary biliary cirrhosis, PSC primary sclerosing cholangitis, RATG rabbit antithymocyte globulin, Tac tacrolimus