Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 1;17(4):435–447. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0214

Table 2.

Characteristics of Patients and Family Members

  Patients Family members
Unique-evaluator characteristics:
Number of evaluators 695 345
Northwestern U.S. study site, n (%) 403 (58.0) 194 (56.2)
Race, n (%)
 African American 167 (24.0) 81 (23.5)
 Non-Hispanic white 455 (65.5) 217 (62.9)
 Other minority 73 (10.5) 31 (9.0)
 Not reported 0 (0.0) 16 (4.6)
Gender, n (%)
 Male 380 (54.7) 94 (27.2)
 Female 315 (45.3) 247 (71.6)
 Not reported 0 (0.0) 4 (1.2)
Age, mean (SD)a 65.4 (4.3) 57.5 (13.6)
Education, n (%)
 Eighth grade or less 47 (6.8) 6 (1.7)
 Some high school 74 (10.6) 23 (6.7)
 High school diploma or equivalent 151 (21.7) 61 (17.7)
 Some college or trade school 206 (29.6) 121 (35.1)
 Four-year college degree 94 (13.5) 67 (19.4)
 Graduate or professional school 97 (14.0) 47 (13.6)
 Not reported 26 (3.7) 20 (5.8)
Average monthly pre-tax income, past year, n (%)
 ≤$500 33 (4.7)  
 $501–$1000 129 (18.6)  
 $1,001–$1,500 84 (12.1)  
 $1,501–$2,000 64 (9.2)  
 $2,001–$3,000 70 (10.1)  
 $3,001–$4,000 61 (8.8)  
 $4,001+ 148 (21.3)  
 Not reported 106 (15.3)  
Seen in inpatient or outpatient setting
 Inpatient 522 (75.1) 294 (85.2)
 Outpatient 171 (24.6) 51 (14.8)
 Both 2 (0.3) 0 (0.0)
Diagnosed withb., n (%)
 Advanced cancer 176 (25.3)  
 Advanced lung disease 48 (6.9)  
 Congestive heart failure 61 (8.8)  
 End-stage liver disease 52 (7.5)  
 Autoimmune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) 25 (3.6)  
Family member also completed evaluation, n (%) 202 (29.1)  
# Evaluations per evaluator, median (range) 1 (1–2) 1 (1–2)
Evaluation-specific characteristics:
 Number of evaluations 731 355
 Single-item self-rated health status, median (IQR)c 2 (2)  
 Rating of quality of end-of-life care,d mean (SD) 8.3 (1.9) 8.4 (2.0)
 Rating of quality of communication, mean (SD)
  General communicatione 8.5 (1.9) 8.5 (2.0)
  End-of-life communicationf 4.6 (3.2) 5.3 (3.4)
a

Ages were reported by only 322 of the 345 family members.

b

Of the patients completing surveys, 49.1% had none of the five diagnoses listed, 49.8% had one, and 1.2% had two.

c

Respondent's rating of current health (reversed scoring): 1=poor, 2=fair, 3=good, 4=very good, 5=excellent. Ratings were provided on 693 surveys.

d

Ten-item scale applicable to all respondent types; computed as the mean of available items from the 10-item pool, with original response range 0 (poor) to 10 (absolutely perfect). Scores were available from 725 patient surveys and 352 family member surveys.

e

Six-item scale computed as mean of available items: 0 (very worst) to 10 (very best). Scores were available from 704 patient surveys and 344 family member surveys.

f

Seven-item scale computed as mean of available items: 0 (very worst) to 10 (very best). Scores were available from 623 patient surveys and 300 family member surveys.

SD, standard deviation; IQR, interquartile ratio.