Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 1;17(4):435–447. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0214

Table 3.

Race and Socioeconomic Status: Associations with Ratings of End-of-Life Care and Communicationa

    Patient ratings Family ratings
Outcome Predictors b p b p
QEOLC Evaluator race/ethnicityb   0.500   0.006
   African American −0.180   −0.646  
   Other minority −0.132   −0.948  
  Evaluator educationc −0.019 0.731 −0.162 0.098
  Evaluator incomed 0.042 0.320    
QOCgen Evaluator race/ethnicitye   >0.500   0.009
   African American −0.136   −0.567  
   Other minority −0.006   −0.935  
  Evaluator educationf 0.010 0.861 −0.086 0.370
  Evaluator incomeg 0.031 0.436    
QOCeol Evaluator race/ethnicityh   0.026   0.110
   African American 0.831   1.088  
   Other minority 0.516   −0.041  
  Evaluator educationi −0.273 0.006 −0.687 <0.001
  Evaluator incomei −0.390 <0.001    
a

Associations were based on cross-classified (evaluator by trainee) hierarchical models, using full maximum likelihood estimation, with continuous linear outcomes and with level-1 slopes fixed over cross-classified level-2 units.

b

Patient model adjusted for recruitment site; trainee age, postgraduate year, and race; patient gender, SF1 health rating, inpatient vs. outpatient site of patient-trainee interaction, and four diagnoses (cancer, congestive heart failure, end-stage liver disease, and AIDS). Family model adjusted for recruitment site.

c

Patient model adjusted for recruitment site and inpatient/outpatient. Family model adjusted for patient race and recruitment site.

d

Model adjusted for two patient diagnosis indicators (cancer and AIDS), education, SF1 health rating, inpatient/outpatient, recruitment site, and the trainee's postgraduate year.

e

Patient model adjusted for recruitment site; trainee's postgraduate year and race; one patient diagnosis (AIDS), inpatient/outpatient, and SF1. Family model adjusted for recruitment site.

f

Patient model adjusted for recruitment site and inpatient/outpatient. Family model adjusted for recruitment site, trainee age, and family race.

g

Model adjusted for recruitment site, trainee's post-graduate year, patient education, SF1, and inpatient/outpatient.

h

Patient model adjusted for patient age and inpatient/outpatient. Family model adjusted for recruitment site; trainee age, postgraduate year, and race; family gender, age, and inpatient/outpatient.

i

Patient model for education adjusted for patient race. There were no confounders of the family education or patient income model.

QEOLC, Quality of End-of-Life Care Questionnaire; QOCgen, general communication score from the Quality of Communication questionnaire; QOCeol, end-of-life care communication score from the Quality of Communication questionnaire.