Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Image Anal. 2014 Feb 20;18(3):555–566. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2014.02.005

Table 3.

Quantitative evaluation. ICVF ([min%, max%]), RMSD (%), AICVFD (%), ASD (mm), RVD (%).The value out of the angular bracket was obtained using the proposed model, and the value in the angular bracket was obtained without considering the metabolic rate. The value in the parenthesis of the ASD is the threshold to extract the predicted tumor from the predicted ICVF map.

Id ICVF Predicted ICVF RMSD AICVFD ASD RVD
1 [0,77] [0,81]<0,83> 4.2<5.1> 3.1<3.7> 2.0<2.4>(34.0) 8.l<9.2>
2 [0,87] [0,88]<0,88> 5.1<5.2> 1.2<1.4> 2.2<2.3>(41.5) 7.6<7.4>
3 [0,69] [0,65]<0,64> 4.6<5.2> 3.1<3.8> 3.3<3.9>(36.0) 10.4<11.0>
4 [0,75] [0,79]<0,80> 3.7<3.5> 2.7<2.8> 3.1<3.2>(31.6) 8.2<8.2>
5 [0,79] [0,77]<0,77> 3.8<4.4> 3.5<4.7> 1.5<2.1>(39.2) 4.5<5.3>
6 [0,66] [0,78]<0,81> 4.1<4.6> 2.2<2.7> 2.4<2.8>(32.2) 7.1<7.3>
mean ± std [0,75±6] [0,78±5]<0,79±6> 4.3±0.4<4.7±0.5> 2.6±0.6<3.2±0.9> 2.4±0.5<2.8±0.5> 7.7±1.3 < 8.1±1.4 >