TABLE 1.
Summary of What Works Clearinghouse criteria for experimental designs.
| Design element | Meets standards | Meets standards, but with reservations | Does not meet standards |
|---|---|---|---|
| Independent variable(s) | Actively manipulated by researcher | — | Researcher does not control changes to conditions |
| Dependent variable(s) | Measured systematically over time | — | No systematic measurement (e.g., anecdotal case study) |
| Measured by more than one assessor | — | Only one assessor | |
| Includes interassessor agreement on at least 20% of data points in each phase | — | No interassessor agreement, only in some phases, or in less than 20% of data points | |
| Interassessor agreement meets minimal thresholds | — | Poor interassessor agreement | |
| Length of phases | At least 5 data points per phase | 3–4 points per phase | < 3 points per phase |
| Replication of effect | General: | — | < 3 replications |
| 3 attempts to demonstrate the effect at three points in time or with three phase repetitions | |||
| Reversal/withdrawal: | — | < 4 phases (e.g., AB, ABA, BAB) | |
| 4 phases per case (e.g., ABAB) | |||
| Changing-criterion: | — | < 3 criteria | |
| 3 criteria | |||
| Multiple-baseline/multiple-probe: | — | < 3 cases; < 6 phases | |
| 6 phases across at least three cases | |||
| Alternating treatments: | Only 4 repetitions | 2 treatments without baseline | |
| 2 treatments compared to baseline or 3 treatments compared to each other | |||
| 5 repetitions of each condition | < 4 repetitions |