Skip to main content
BMJ Case Reports logoLink to BMJ Case Reports
. 2014 Apr 17;2014:bcr2014204116. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2014-204116

Lateral foot pain following open reduction and internal fixation of the fracture of the fifth metatarsal tubercle: treated by arthroscopic arthrolysis and endoscopic tenolysis

Tun Hing Lui 1
PMCID: PMC3992546  PMID: 24744074

Abstract

We report a case of fracture of the tuberosity of the fifth metatarsal which was managed by tension band wiring and bone grafting. It was complicated by symptomatic fibrosis of the operated site involving the cubometatarsal joint, peroneus brevis tendon, peroneus tertius tendon and the long extensor tendon to the fifth toe. This was successfully managed by arthroscopic lysis of the involved joint and tendons.

Background

Fracture of the proximal fifth metatarsal bone can be classified into fractures of tuberosity (zone I), proximal metadiaphysis (zone II) and diaphysis (zone III).1 2 It can be subdivided into acute fracture, delayed healing and a developed non-union.1 Displaced intra-articular zone I and displaced zone II fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal bone are frequently complicated by delayed non-union due to a vascular watershed.3

Non-operative treatment remains a viable choice in most of the acute cases, with union rate between 72% and 93%.1 2 4 Surgical intervention for the acute Jones fracture should be reserved for the athletic individual because there is a clear advantage in terms of time to return to sporting activity.5 6 Displacement of more than 2 mm or comminution of fractures of the tuberosity should be reduced. Fracture reduction and fixation should also be considered in fractures that involve more than 30% of the cubometatarsal joint.7 Non-acute diaphyseal stress fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal and Jones fractures that develop into delayed unions and non-unions can both be managed with operative fixation.2 8

We report a case of fracture of the tuberosity of the fifth metatarsal which was managed by tension band wiring and bone grafting. It was complicated by symptomatic fibrosis of the operated site and was successfully treated arthroscopically.

Case presentation

A 43-year-old woman had an inversion sprain to her left foot resulting in fracture of the tubercle of her left fifth metatarsal (figure 1). She was treated with a short leg cast and non-weight bearing walking for 4 weeks and then partial weight bearing walking with a wooden base sandal. She reported persistent pain and swelling over the fracture site. Radiographs taken 2 months after the injury showed widened fracture gap (figure 2). Open reduction, tension band wiring and autologous bone grafting of the fracture site were performed through dorsolateral wound (figure 3). The pain improved with healing of the fracture site. However, she noticed rest pain over the base of the fifth metatarsal with increased pain and swelling after walking. Clinically, there was mild local tenderness without sign of local inflammation. She was diagnosed to be suffering from impingement pain by the implants. The implants were removed 8 months after the key operation (figure 4). However, the pain persisted and she was referred to our clinic for subsequent management. Clinically, there was tenderness over the fifth cubometatarsal joint, tubercle of the fifth metatarsal and the surgical scar. The pain can also be triggered by ankle plantarflexion, foot supination or plantarflexion of the fifth toe. The surgical scar was stuck to the bone and not mobile.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Radiographs showed fracture of the tubercle of the patient's left fifth metatarsal.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Radiographs taken 2 months after the injury showed widened fracture gap.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open reduction, tension band wiring and autologous bone grafting of the fracture site was performed. Chevron osteotomy of the first metatarsal was also performed to correct the hallux valgus deformity.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Radiographs showed that all the implants were removed.

Investigations

MRI of her left foot did not reveal any significant pathology over the previously operated site (figure 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

MRI did not reveal any significant pathology at the proximal fifth metatarsal.

Treatment

The patient was treated with insole and physiotherapy of deep scar massage, active and passive mobilisation of joints of the toes and foot, ultrasound therapy and laser therapy for 4 months. However, the pain was not relieved. It was partly relieved with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Arthroscopy of the fifth cubometatarsal joint was performed.9 There was fibrosis of the dorsal joint capsule and fibrosis around the insertion of the peroneus brevis tendon, the peroneus tertius tendon and the long extensor tendon to the fifth toe. The extra-articular part of the cartilage of the base of the fifth metatarsal was found to be fibrillation (figure 6). The intra-articular portion of the cartilage was normal. Arthroscopic lysis of the tendons (figure 7) and the joint was performed. Postoperatively, she was advised on vigorous ankle and toe mobilisation.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

(A) Cubometatarsal arthroscopy with 2.7 mm 30° arthroscope and 2.9 mm arthroscopic shaver. (B) Arthroscopic view after resection of the fibrous tissue. Cartilage fibrillation was seen in the non-articulated part of the base of fifth metatatarsal. a: articulated part of the cartilage of the base of the fifth metatarsal; b:cartilage of the cuboid; c: peroneus brevis tendon. Arthroscopic images were overlapped in order to show the entire joint on different views.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

(A) Arthroscopic lysis of the tendons. (B) Arthroscopic views showing the resection of the fibrous tissue around the long extensor tendon to the fifth toe (A) from proximal distally.

Outcome and follow-up

The preoperative pain was subsided and there was no surgical complication noted. She remained asymptomatic 13 months after the operation.

Discussion

The operation of the non-union or delayed union of the fracture of the proximal fifth metatarsal bone consists in resection of non-union and bone grafting.6 The optimal surgical fixation for these fractures has not been determined.5 7 The fixation options include percutaneous K wire fixation,6 tension band wiring,1 10 bicortical screw fixation,3 intramedullary screw,11–14 Ilizarov external minifixator,5 minifragment plate and screws6 and XS-nail.15 Tension band wiring was performed in this case in order to achieve interfragmental compression across the fracture site and compensate the tension applied to the proximal fragment through the peroneal tension.15

Surgical intervention can achieve a high rate of fracture union, but the complication rate of surgery is also high.4 Dehiscence of the wound,1 13 irritation by hardware1 11 implant failures,11 intraoperative fracture,11 refracture, delayed union or non-union,5 12 deep infection,5 13 nerve injury13 16 and joint subluxation5 have been reported. Our patient reported persistent pain over the operative site which was initially believed to be caused by implant impingement. However, the symptom persisted after the removal of the implants. The stiff surgical scar suggested extensive scarring at the operated site. Triggering of pain by ankle plantarflexion, foot supination or plantarflexion of the fifth toe suggested that the surrounding tendons namely peroneus brevis, peroneus tertius and long extensor tendon to the fifth toe were involved.6 We believed that the symptomatic fibrosis was a result of extensive soft tissue dissection during the previous operation and prolonged postoperative immobilisation. Although the implants were removed, no proper postoperative physiotherapy was given until she was referred to the clinic 4 months after the operation. The failure of relief of the symptoms was believed to be due to the delay of postoperative physiotherapy.

Although preoperative MRI did not suggest any cause of the symptoms, clinical examination suggested that the patient suffered from symptomatic fibrosis of the previous operated site. The arthroscopic approach can allow detailed assessment of the joint and tendons around the previous operated site. The cartilage fibrillation of the non-articulated part of the base of the fifth metatarsal was believed to be a result of previous operation and insertion of the K wires.

Arthroscopic lysis of arthrofibrosis and fibrosis around the tendons has been described in the foot and ankle.17–24 It was performed because it was a minimally invasive approach and allowed early mobilisation of the foot and ankle (figure 8). This can minimise the chance of recurrence of symptoms.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Clinical photos taken 1 week after the operation showed that there was minimal soft tissue swelling and the toes and ankle can be plantarflexed to stretch the tendons without disruption to the small portal wounds.

Learning points.

  • If surgical intervention is indicated in fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal, stable fixation with good interfragmental compression is needed to prevent late complications.

  • Proper postoperative rehabilitation including early toe and ankle mobilisation and scar management will avoid development of symptomatic fibrosis of the operated site.

  • Symptomatic fibrosis of the operated site is diagnosed mainly based on clinical examination.

  • Arthroscopic lysis of the involved joint and tendons allows early postoperative mobilisation of the toe and ankle and prevent recurrence of symptoms.

Footnotes

Competing interests: None.

Patient consent: Obtained.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

References

  • 1.Malkus T, Soukup B. Jones fracture. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 1999;66:15–21 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rosenberg GA, Sferra JJ. Treatment strategies for acute fractures and nonunions of the proximal fifth metatarsal. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2000;8:332–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mahajan V, Chung HW, Suh JS. Fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal: percutaneous bicortical fixation. Clin Orthop Surg 2011;3:140–6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dean BJ, Kothari A, Uppal H, et al. The Jones fracture classification, management, outcome, and complications: a systematic review. Foot Ankle Spec 2012;5:256–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tomic S, Vucic V, Dobric M, et al. Treatment of acute Jones fracture with Ilizarov external minifixator: case series of six elite athletes. J Foot Ankle Surg 2013;52:374–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fetzer GB, Wright RW. Metatarsal shaft fractures and fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal. Clin Sports Med 2006;25:139–50 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zwitser EW, Breederveld RS. Fractures of the fifth metatarsal; diagnosis and treatment. Injury 2010;41:555–62 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Thomas JL, Davis BC. Treatment of Jones fracture nonunion with isolated intramedullary screw fixation. J Foot Ankle Surg 2011;50:566–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lui TH. Arthroscopic tarsometatarsal (lisfranc) arthrodesis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007;15:671–5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hulkko A, Orava S, Nikula P. Stress fracture of the fifth metatarsal in athletes. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1985;74:233–8 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Metzl J, Olson K, Davis WH, et al. A clinical and radiographic comparison of two hardware systems used to treat Jones fracture of the fifth metatarsal. Foot Ankle Int 2013;34:956–61 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hunt KJ, Anderson RB. Treatment of Jones fracture nonunions and refractures in the elite athlete: outcomes of intramedullary screw fixation with bone grafting. Am J Sports Med 2011;39:1948–54 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Habbu RA, Marsh RS, Anderson JG, et al. Closed intramedullary screw fixation for nonunion of fifth metatarsal Jones fracture. Foot Ankle Int 2011;32:603–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Roche AJ, Calder JDF. Treatment and return to sport following a Jones fracture of the fifth metatarsal: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013;21:1307–15 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Renner C, Whyte J, Singh S. Treatment of fractures of the fifth metatarsal with the XS-nail retrospective study and comparison with tension-band wiring. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2010;130:1149–56 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fansa AM, Smyth NA, Murawski CD, et al. The lateral dorsal cutaneous branch of the sural nerve: clinical importance of the surgical approach to proximal fifth metatarsal fracture fixation. Am J Sports Med 2012;40:1895–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lui TH. Arthroscopic release of first metatarsophalangeal arthrofibrosis. Arthroscopy 2006;22:906e1–4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lui TH. Arthroscopic subtalar release of post-traumatic subtalar stiffness. Arthroscopy 2006;22:1364e1–4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lui TH, Chan WK, Chan KB. The arthroscopic management of frozen ankle. Arthroscopy 2006;22:283–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lui TH. Extensor tendoscopy of the ankle. Foot Ankle Surg 2011;17:e1–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lui TH. Arthroscopically assisted Z-lengthening of extensor hallucis longus tendon. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2007;127:855–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lui TH. Endoscopic adhesiolysis for extensive tibialis posterior tendon and Achilles tendon adhesions following compound tendon rupture. BMJ Case Rep 2013;2013:pii20133200824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chang JJ, Lui TH. Endoscopic-assisted repair of extensor hallucis longus tendon rerupture. Foot Ankle Int 2013;34:455–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lui TH. Endoscopic Achilles tenolysis for management of heel cord pain after repair of acute rupture of Achilles tendon. J Foot Ankle Surg 2013;52:125–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ Case Reports are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES