Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 21.
Published in final edited form as: Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009 Oct 1;18(3):555–562. doi: 10.1038/oby.2009.303

Table 2.

Association of NFKBIA SNPs with SI in San Antonio sample

SNP MAF Genotypic mean (s.d.) n
P valuea
11 12 22
rs1951276b 0.224 2.80 (1.85) n = 279 2.03 (1.82) n = 166 1.90 (1.85) n =15 3.52 × 10−5
rs8019505 0.364 2.72 (1.73) n = 207 2.57 (1.86) n =214 2.27 (1.86) n = 60 0.127
rs12891443 0.455 2.37 (1.88) n = 142 2.56 (1.89) n = 234 2.35 (1.68) n = 106 0.519
rs743228b 0.410 2.54 (1.86) n =176 2.57 (1.91) n = 217 2.27 (1.72) n = 91 0.861
rs7152826b 0.468 2.41 (1.87) n = 125 2.37 (1.88) n = 233 2.83 (1.77) n = 131 0.024
rs3138056b 0.490 2.51 (1.78) n = 129 2.65 (1.88) n = 242 2.13 (1.83) n = 109 0.150
rs3138055b 0.372 2.63 (1.84) n = 203 2.34 (1.88) n = 221 2.39 (1.83) n = 46 0.055
rs696b,c 0.314 2.46 (1.79) n = 193 2.51 (1.87) n = 226 2.29 (1.95) n = 64 0.438
rs3138054b 0.107 2.44 (1.88) n = 387 2.58 (1.72) n = 89 2.82 (1.96) n = 6 0.804d
rs1957106b 0.202 2.43 (1.83) n = 295 2.52 (1.85) n = 151 2.41 (2.03) n = 34 0.176
rs2233409b 0.130 2.49 (1.88) n = 359 2.30 (1.76) n = 118 4.11 (1.28) n = 3 0.745d
rs3138053b 0.219 2.45 (1.92) n = 293 2.57 (1.80) n = 178 2.46 (1.55) n = 17 0.731
rs3138045 0.185 2.44 (1.89) n = 322 2.55 (1.79) n = 153 2.27 (1.56) n = 13 0.923
rs4982270 0.476 2.15 (1.90) n = 152 2.44 (1.78) n = 232 2.70 (1.91) n = 96 0.043
rs2007960 0.252 2.09 (1.78) n = 292 2.23 (1.77) n = 164 2.66 (1.88) n = 29 0.021
rs17103274 0.081 2.45 (1.85) n = 414 2.77 (1.88) n = 77 1.37 (2.37) n = 3 0.879d
rs8013309 0.119 2.46 (1.84) n = 372 2.64 (1.92) n = 110 1.96 (1.79) n = 9 0.662d
rs1012919 0.202 2.59 (1.87) n = 328 2.25 (1.83) n = 134 2.30 (1.78) n = 20 0.083
rs17103282 0.033 2.54 (1.86) n = 450 2.01 (1.85) n = 36 e 0.543d
rs8018407 0.272 2.54 (1.87) n = 289 2.42 (1.81) n =165 2.04 (1.79) n = 27 0.214
rs8018193 0.308 2.31 (1.84) n = 210 2.58 (1.8) n = 214 2.86 (2.05) n = 60 0.022
rs2415290 0.161 2.21 (1.70) n = 364 2.13 (1.84) n = 110 2.58 (1.85) n = 9 0.024d
rs8008601 0.483 2.38 (1.90) n = 113 2.48 (1.82) n = 259 2.50 (1.85) n = 109 0.205
rs762009 0.392 2.43 (1.80) n = 167 2.52 (1.88) n = 254 2.31 (1.86) n = 59 0.241
rs4982271 0.391 2.61 (1.95) n = 214 2.37 (1.78) n = 208 2.51 (1.80) n = 70 0.265

All P values are adjusted for admixture, age, and gender. Mean values shown are the unadjusted genotypic means (s.d.) for SI. n is the number of individuals with that genotype. Nominally significant P values are in boldface.

a

P values are for the additive model unless indicated.

b

First 11 SNPs typed (r2 ≥ 0.65 with untyped SNPs). 14 SNPs with no superscript were typed after results from first 11 obtained (r2 ≥ 0.90 with untyped SNPs).

c

SNPs rs696 and rs8904 were in near-perfect LD (San Antonio: r2 = 0.963; San Luis Valley: r2= 1.00). Only SNP rs696 was tested for association with SI.

d

P values are for the dominant model because there were <10 minor allele homozygotes.

e

There were no minor allele homozygotes for this SNP.