Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 21.
Published in final edited form as: Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009 Oct 1;18(3):555–562. doi: 10.1038/oby.2009.303

Table 3.

Association of NFKBIA SNPs with SI in San Luis Valley sample

SNP MAF Genotypic mean (s.d.) N
P valuea
11 12 22
rs1951276b 0.277 3.17 (1.89) n = 258 2.86 (1.86) n =167 3.01 (2.00) n = 37 0.521
rs8019505 0.313 3.05 (1.91) n = 239 3.06 (1.86) n = 187 3.13 (1.95) n = 44 0.803
rs12891443 0.468 2.95 (1.88) n = 132 3.04 (1.86) n = 247 3.12 (2.00) n = 93 0.486
rs743228b 0.442 3.05 (1.98) n = 134 2.95 (1.89) n = 244 3.30 (1.79) n = 92 0.302
rs7152826b 0.386 3.15 (1.84) n = 177 2.91 (1.94) n = 254 3.44 (1.87) n = 48 0.215
rs3138056b 0.473 2.88 (1.99) n = 135 3.15 (1.87) n = 235 3.03 (1.75) n = 99 0.131
rs3138055b 0.480 3.05 (1.85) n = 122 2.81 (1.92) n = 256 3.56 (1.82) n = 91 0.889
rs696b,c 0.272 3.05 (1.89) n = 251 3.07 (1.89) n = 190 2.79 (1.85) n = 29 0.431
rs3138054b 0.107 3.07 (1.90) n = 398 2.90 (1.84) n = 72 3.75 (1.21) n = 1 0.951d
rs1957106b 0.201 3.06 (1.87) n = 282 3.07 (1.89) n = 165 2.46 (2.08) n = 20 0.755
rs2233409b 0.135 3.17 (1.88) n = 368 2.57 (1.91) n = 99 3.12 (1.29) n = 3 0.117d
rs3138053b 0.182 3.11 (1.86) n = 337 3.02 (2.00) n = 125 3.18 (1.54) n = 9 0.992d
rs3138045 0.146 3.06 (1.86) n = 359 2.99 (2.04) n = 106 3.18 (1.54) n = 9 0.663d
rs4982270 0.468 2.91 (1.82) n = 128 3.27 (1.92) n = 237 2.72 (1.92) n = 104 0.785
rs2007960 0.257 2.58 (1.93) n = 274 3.17 (1.81) n = 172 3.03 (1.94) n = 31 0.857
rs17103274 0.053 3.10 (1.89) n = 432 2.71 (1.79) n = 47 e 0.974d
rs8013309 0.088 3.13 (1.89) n = 394 2.70 (1.88) n = 83 e 0.559d
rs1012919 0.230 3.01 (1.96) n = 290 3.22 (1.77) n = 158 3.08 (1.94) n = 19 0.234
rs17103282 0.026 3.10 (1.89) n = 443 2.40 (1.86) n = 26 e 0.304d
rs8018407 0.276 3.03 (1.96) n = 270 3.21 (1.77) n = 169 2.72 (1.85) n = 31 0.426
rs8018193 0.342 3.00 (1.90) n = 208 3.22 (1.87) n = 208 2.70 (1.94) n = 62 0.918
rs2415290 0.179 3.22 (2.03) n = 332 3.22 (1.78) n = 135 2.98 (1.93) n = 10 0.443
rs8008601 0.491 3.36 (1.90) n = 125 2.98 (1.89) n = 237 2.81 (1.89) n = 110 0.596
rs762009 0.395 3.17 (1.96) n = 176 3.06 (1.91) n = 225 2.99 (1.86) n = 68 0.727
rs4982271 0.302 2.87 (1.94) n = 222 3.34 (1.83) n = 198 2.83 (1.88) n = 53 0.455

All P values are adjusted for admixture, age, and gender. Mean values shown are the unadjusted genotypic means (s.d.) for SI. n is the number of individuals with that genotype. Nominally significant P values are in boldface.

a

P values are for the additive model unless indicated.

b

First 11 SNPs typed (r2 ≥ 0.65 with untyped SNPs). 14 SNPs with no superscript were typed after the results from first 11 obtained (r2 ≥ 0.90 with untyped SNPs).

c

SNPs rs696 and rs8904 were in near-perfect LD (San Antonio: r2 = 0.963; San Luis Valley: r2 = 1.00). Only SNP rs696 was tested for association with SI.

d

P values are for the dominant model because there were <10 minor allele homozygotes.

e

There were no minor allele homozygotes for this SNP.