Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biomater Sci. 2014 Feb 14;2(4):436–471. doi: 10.1039/C3BM60181A

Table 3.

Comparison of actual ssDNA conditions experienced at array surfaces versus those typically reported in ssDNA physicochemical models and simulations.

ssDNA properties at surfaces ssDNA tethered in microarrays ssDNA brush modeling
ssDNA grafting density Uncontrolled grafting density, spanning sparse, mushroom and brush in the same surface locale Controlled, uniform grafting density of mushroom or brush across an impenetrable surface
Tethered ssDNA chain orientations Uncontrolled immobilized chain orientations and conformations Uniform controlled brush heights and chain orientations
ssDNA chain lengths 20–200 bases (short) probes >1000 bases (long) brushes
ssDNA chain flexibility ssDNA is short, rigid, rod-like ssDNA is longer, flexlble
ssDNA solvent/media exposure High ionic strength but complex mixed salt solutions, surfactants and other solutes in drying cycles Wide range of salt concentrations (monovalent)
Interactive conditions at the surface Repeated surface solvation/drying steps in assay that modulate ionic strength and solvation dramatically Equilibrium models or constrained simulations, with little dynamic interactive changes in polymer/solvent/surface conditions
ssDNA chain dynamics under a given analysis Persistence lengths, radius of gyration, brush heights and chain condensation vary widely Persistence lengths, radius of gyration, brush heights and chain condensation vary little