. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 21.

Published in final edited form as: Int J Billing. 2012 Apr 20;17(1):57–70. doi: 10.1177/1367006911431198

Table 2.

Intercorrelations between L2 exposure, expressive vocabulary, proportion of TE, and CCT measures in bilinguals.

Variables	1	2	3	4	5	6	7
1. Overall exposure to L2	–	−.31	−.48^b	.67^b	.31	−.11	−.32
2. Total vocabulary		–	.96^b	.10	.65^b	.64^b	−.22
3. LI total vocabulary			–	−.13	.46^b	.61^b	−.12
4. Proportion of words in L2				–	.68^b	.35	−.50^b
5. TEs					–	.58^b	−.49^a
6. Accuracy on CCT (n = 20)						–	−.28
7. RT on CCT (correct trials) (n = 20)							–

TE: translation equivalent; CCT: Computerized Comprehension Task.

Correlation is significant at the .05 level (one tailed).

Correlation is significant at the .01 level (one tailed).