Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 21.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Neuropsychol. 2013;38(8):595–612. doi: 10.1080/87565641.2012.694512

TABLE 3.

Frontal Source Means and Standard Errors for Feedback With Regional Difference Tests

Frontal Source by Condition (over 200–350 msec)
Regional Difference Tests
Region Reward Non-reward t p Difference Difference Comparison t p
BA 10 0.392 (0.019) 0.360 (0.017) 2.42 .018 .032 (.013) BA 25 vs. BA 10 6.88** <.001
BA 25 vs. BA 11 7.32** <.001
BA 11 0.863 (0.039) 0.762 (0.037) 3.48* <.001 .101 (.029) BA 25 vs. BA 24 6.48** <.001
BA 25 vs. BA 32 7.11** <.001
BA 24 0.865 (0.043) 0.765 (0.031) 3.46* <.001 .100 (.029) BA 24 vs. BA 10 2.38 .020
BA 24 vs. BA 11 − 0.04 .970
BA 25 2.412 (0.093) 1.911 (0.081) 7.27* <.001 .501 (.069) BA 24 vs. BA 32 3.16** .002
BA 32 vs. BA 10 0.01 .920
BA 32 0.558 (0.023) 0.525 (0.019) 1.79 .077 .034 (.019) BA 32 vs. BA 11 − 2.43 .017
BA 10 vs. BA 11 − 2.69 .009

Note. BA10 (anterior prefrontal/orbitofrontal cortex), BA11 (orbitofrontal cortex), BA24 (ventral posterior cingulate cortex), BA25 (subgenual cortex), and BA32 (dorsal anterior cingulate cortex). Difference = Reward – Non-reward. (Frontal source condition effects tested at

*

p < .01; Regional differences tested at

**

p < .005, Bonferroni corrected.)