. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 21.

Published in final edited form as: IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2013 Mar-Apr;10(2):494–503. doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2013.25

TABLE 3.

Comparison of the Peak Matching Results by Using OpenMS Alone (Upcoupled) and Using Three Profile-Based Alignment Models for RT Correction Prior to Applying OpenMS (DTW+, CPM+ and BAM+) on the Metabolomic Data Sets

		OpenMS
		Uncoupled	DTW+	CPM+	BAM+
M1	Recall	0.87	0.85	0.34	0.88
	Precision	0.69	0.74	0.68	0.74
	F-measure	0.77	0.79	0.45	0.80

M2	Recall	0.93	0.97	−	0.97
	Precision	0.79	0.83	−	0.83
	F-measure	0.85	0.89	−	0.89