Skip to main content
. 2014 May;52(5):1617–1621. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00001-14

TABLE 1.

Susceptibilities to tigecycline among Gram-negative isolates from unique patients as determined by various testing methodologiesa

Organism (n) Susceptibility of isolates (no. [%]), determined by:
Etest
BMDb
MicroScan
Vitek-2
Susceptible Intermediate Resistant Susceptible Intermediate Resistant Susceptible Intermediate Resistant Susceptible Intermediate Resistant
A. baumannii (1,105) 436 (40.3) 515 (47.6) 132 (12.2) 956 (88) 109 (10) 21 (1.9) 1,009 (93.2) 56 (5.2) 18 (1.7) 643 (63.9) 311 (31.1) 50 (5)
ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceaec (2,065) 1,979 (96.4) 66 (3.3) 8 (0.3) 2,008 (98.1) 33 (1.6) 5 (0.2) 2,024 (98.7) 25 (1.2) 2 (0.1) 1,781 (96.3) 38 (2) 32 (1.8)
CREd (369) 291 (79.3) 70 (19) 6 (1.7) 336 (91.6) 23 (6.3) 8 (2.1) 331 (90.7) 29 (7.9) 5 (1.4) 264 (78.8) 29 (8.7) 42 (12.6)
Susceptible Enterobacteriaceae (888) 844 (96.8) 24 (2.7) 4 (0.4) 855 (98.2) 11 (1.3) 5 (0.6) 854 (98.8) 10 (1.2) 0 665 (97.5) 4 (0.6) 13 (1.9)
a

n = 4,427.

b

BMD, broth microdilution.

c

ESBL, extended-spectrum β-lactamase.

d

CRE, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae.