Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 16;13(4):1823–1832. doi: 10.1021/pr401090d

Table 3. Confidence in Algorithm Detected Peptides Depends on Parent Protein Expression and Distance from Decoy FDR Threshold.

    SEQUEST
OMSSA
    conforming peptidesb nonconforming peptides conformance scored conforming peptides nonconforming peptides conformance scored
(A) log(PE)a            
  undetected 669 115 85.3 558 74 88.3
  x ≤ 3 171 117 59.4 102 62 62.2
  3 < x ≤ 4 668 228 74.6 652 169 79.4
  4< x ≤ 5 1467 258 85.0 1446 215 87.1
  x >5 1093 166 86.8 850 133 86.5
 
(B) scoring confidencec (d)            
  d ≤ 1 724 420 63.3 431 270 61.5
  1 < d ≤ 3 1291 241 84.3 741 135 84.6
  3 < d ≤ 5 938 135 87.4 787 106 88.1
  5 < d ≤ 7 597 66 90.0 642 93 87.3
  d >7 561 43 92.9 1123 101 91.7
a

Protein expression (PE; estimated protein molecules per cell) based on large scale Western analysis.13

b

Peptides are counted once per LC–MS/MS run even if detected by both the b/y and a/b/y ion screens and, in the case of OMSSA, even if detected by multiple parameter sets.

c

Scoring confidence d = −log10(PSM_score/FDR_threshold). For OMSSA, the algorithm PSM score used was the e-value. For SEQUEST, implemented in Proteome Discoverer 1.2, we used the probability outputs to compute a PSM score = 10(probability/–10).

d

Conformance scores are significantly depressed for lower abundance proteins (chi-squared: SEQUEST, p < 6.18 × 10–36; OMSSA, p < 3.46 × 10–20) and for lower d scores (SEQUEST, p < 7.23 × 10–80; OMSSA, p < 6.25 × 10–72)