Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 21;9(4):e95715. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095715

Table 4. Clasification accuracy comparison (%) normalized data.

Dataset
Algorithm Breast Cancer Haberman’s Survival Hepatitis Disease Liver Disorders
AdaBoostM1 95.05 74.02 89.80 67.72
BayesNet 97.34 71.73 87.68 56.62
BFTree 94.80 72.43 88.92 67.15
CHAT-OHM 95.52 62.45 89.52 58.5
ComplementNaiveBayes N/A N/A N/A N/A
ConjunctiveRule 91.98 72.97 89.05 56.28
DecisionTable 95.69 71.90 88.46 58.83
DMNBtext 90.00 73.01 88.99 64.17
IB1 95.46 65.58 81.03 63.25
LWL 92.14 71.90 89.95 60.74
MultiBoostAB 94.73 73.28 89.49 64.29
MultiScheme 65.01 73.53 79.38 57.98
NaiveBayes 96.11 74.66 87.36 55.42
NaiveBayesMultinomial N/A N/A N/A N/A
RandomForest 96.33 67.81 90.54 68.44
RandomTree 94.79 64.96 83.70 62.75
RBFNetwork 96.36 73.75 85.78 64.81
SMO 96.88 73.53 88.70 57.90
Vote 65.01 73.53 79.38 57.98
VotedPerceptron 96.87 75.09 85.03 65.86