Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Menopause. 2014 May;21(5):450–458. doi: 10.1097/GME.0b013e3182a4690b

Table 4.

Association between vaginal bacterial community state type, menopausal status and signs of vulvovaginal atrophy, adjusted for confounding factorsa

Community state type (CST) CST I CST II or Vb CST III CST IVA CST IVB
Dominant bacterial species L. crispatus L. gasseri or L. jensenni L. iners Low-lactobacillus Low-lactobacillus, Atopobium
Vulvovaginal atrophyd OR (95% CrI)c aOR (95% CrI) OR (95% CrI) aOR (95% CrI) OR (95% CrI) aOR (95% CrI) OR (95% CrI) aOR (95% CrI)
  Mild or Moderate 1 0.53 (0.01, 5.08) 0.32 (0.01, 3.61) 0.46 (0.05, 2.94) 0.46 (0.05, 3.01) 23.58 (3.64, 234.05) 25.89 (2.98, 406.79) 3.50 (0.74, 18.82) 5.24 (0.85, 40.42)
  None 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Vaginal drynesse
  Mild, Moderate, or Severe 1 1.20 (0.03, 12.86) 0.96 (0.02, 15.10) 1.10 (0.10, 17.92) 1.09 (0.10, 11.12) 11.15 (1.55, 122.82) 9.92 (0.98, 117.82) 3.89 (0.48, 42.05) 3.71 (0.41, 40.50)
  None 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
a

Analysis adjusted for sexual activity in prior 6 months, race, marital status, and lifetime number of sexual partners

b

CSTs combined due to data sparseness.

c

Odds ratio (OR) and adjusted odds ratio (aOR) with 95% credible interval (CI).

d

Mild and moderate vulvovaginal atrophy combined due to data sparseness.

e

Mild, moderate and severe vaginal dryness combined due to data sparseness.