Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2013 Oct 21;72(3):864–875. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24984

Table 3.

Summary of comparisons across genders and ROIs, of CBV and CBF values at rest, during activation, and percentage changes with activation.


Comparison Rest CBV
Activation
Change Rest CBF
Activation
Change



Gender NS P ~ 0.2 P ~ 0.2 P < 0.05 P < 0.05 P ~ 0.2
Spatial P < 0.051 P < 0.051 NS2 NS3 P < 0.053 NS4

(NS: not significant;

Spatial: across all ROI combinations, P<0.05 in 197%, 231%, 319%, 494%, 39% of cases);

Age difference between genders was NS, P=0.897).