Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 4;13:70. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-13-70

Table 4.

Comparison of 18 F-FDG-PET/CT results between the NWL and NWO subjects by gender

 
Men
p Women
P
 
Total
NWL
NWO
Total
NWL
NWO
  (N = 66) (N = 33) (N = 33) (N = 98) (N = 49) (N = 49)
SUVmean, jugular vein
1.15 ± 0.19
1.18 ± 1.19
1.12 ± 0.19
0.267
1.15 ± 0.24
1.15 ± 0.25
1.16 ± 0.24
0.736
SUVmean, carotid artery
1.60 ± 0.26
1.56 ± 0.28
1.63 ± 0.25
0.232
1.59 ± 0.35
1.52 ± 0.33
1.65 ± 0.35
0.058
SUVmax, carotid artery
1.83 ± 0.33
1.76 ± 0.31
1.90 ± 0.33
0.067
1.82 ± 0.41
1.74 ± 0.40
1.90 ± 0.41
0.057
TBRmean, carotid artery
1.40 ± 0.17
1.33 ± 0.15
1.47 ± 0.16
0.001
1.38 ± 0.22
1.33 ± 0.20
1.43 ± 0.22
0.015
TBRmax, carotid artery 1.60 ± 0.23 1.50 ± 0.18 1.71 ± 0.22 <0.001 1.59 ± 0.27 1.54 ± 0.26 1.65 ± 0.27 0.038

NWL, normal weight lean; NWO, normal weight obesity; N, number; SUVmean/max, mean/maximum standardized uptake value; TBRmean/max, mean/maximum target-to-background ratio. Data are presented as mean ± SD. The p values represent differences between groups determined by the independent two-sample t-test.