Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 24;7:121. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-7-121

Table 1.

Abundance of I. ricinus ticks in forested urban and natural regions of Poland

Collection site Quality of habitat Abundance of Ixodes ricinus ticks (per 100 m 2 [95% CL])
Total, all months
May
July
September
Nymphs Females Males Total Nymphs Females Males Total Nymphs Females Males Total Nymphs Females Males Total
Bielański Forest
urban
8.3
0.9
1.2
10.5
17.5
4.0
0.5
22.0
9.5
2.0
1.5
13.0
11.8
2.3
1.1
15.2*
8.8
[5,3-11,3]
[0,1-1,8]
[0,2-2,3]
[6,8-14,1]
[5,4-29,6]
[0,4-7,6]
[0,0-4,9]
[7,2-36,8]
[0,0-21,6]
[0,0-5,6]
[0,0-5,9]
[0,0-27,8]
[6.0-17.6]
[0.6-4.0]
[0.0-3.2]
[8.1-22.2]
[5.9-11.6]
Kabacki Forest
3.7
0.2
0.3
4.2
6.0
1.5
1.0
8.5
9.5
0.0
1.5
11.0
6.4
0.6
0.9
7.9
[0,0-7,5]
[0,0-1,3]
[0,0-1,6]
[0,0-8,8]
[0,0-18,1]
[0,0-5,1]
[0,0-5,4]
[0,0-23,3]
[0,0-21,6]
[0,0-3,6]
[0,0-5,9]
[0,0-25,8]
[0.6-12.2]
[0.0-2.3]
[0.0-3.0]
[0.8-15.1]
 
BNP
natural
11.5
3.4
3.9
18.8
21.3
2.3
2.7
26.3
8.2
2.2
1.7
12.1
13.7
2.6
2.8
19.1*
13.4
[7,6-15,5]
[2,2-4,5]
[2,5-5,4]
[14,0-23,6]
[14,3-28,3]
[0,3-4,4]
[0,2-5,2]
[17,8-34,9]
[2,5-13,9]
[0,5-3,9]
[0,0-3,7]
[5,1-19,1]
[10.4-17.0]
[1.7-3.6]
[1.6-3.9]
[15.1-23.1]
[10.9-16.0]
KNP
1.7
2.1
2.9
6,8
2.3
0.8
1.3
4.5
6.0
0.3
1.0
7.3
3.4
1.1
1.8
6.2
[0,0-6,2]
[0,8-3,4]
[1,3-4,5]
[1,4-12,2]
[0,0-9,3]
[0,0-2,9]
[0,0-3,8]
[0,0-13,0]
[0,0-14,6]
[0,0-2,8]
[0,0-4,1]
[0,0-17,7]
[0.0-7.3]
[0.0-2.2]
[0.3-3.2]
[1.3-11.0]
MLP
13.3
0.3
0.5
14,1
3.0
0.0
5.0
8.0
10.0
2.0
2.4
14.4
8.8
0.8
2.6
12.2*
[8,6-18,1]
[0,0-1,7]
[0,0-2,2]
[8,3-19,9]
[0,0-20,1]
[0,0-5,0]
[0,0-11,2]
[0,0-28,9]
[2,3-17,7]
[0,0-4,3]
[0,0-5,2]
[5,0-23,8]
[2.3-15.2]
[0.0-2.7]
[0.3-4,9]
[4.2-20.0]
Total, all sites 7.7
1.4
1.7
10.9
10.0
1.7
2.1
13.9
8.6
1.3
1.6
11.6
8.8
1,5
1.8
12.1 [9.3-14.9]
[5.9-9.5] [0.9-1.9] [1.1-2.4] [8.7-13.1] [4.8-15.2] [0.2-3.3] [0.2-4.0] [7.5-20.3] [4,4-12.9] [0.0-2.6] [0.1-3.2] [6.3-16.8] [6.5-11.1] [0.8-2.2] [1.0-2.7]

CL- 95% confidence limits.

*classified as high-tick-density forests.

N- nymphs, F- females, M-males.