Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 22.
Published in final edited form as: Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2010 Oct 23;6(12):1477–1491. doi: 10.1517/17425255.2010.523420

Table 1.

Considerations for the use of microdialysis for neuro-pharmacokinetic studies in patients with brain tumors.

Advantages Disadvantages
Near real-time measurement of unbound drug near
site of action in the brain; distinction between
extracellular space and other compartments
Invasive technique
Simultaneous measurement of drug pharmacokinetics
in brain and plasma contributes to decreased
interpatient variability
Requires hospitalization
CNS concentration–time profiles of drugs can be
determined using a relatively small number of patients
Expensive, particularly if hospitalization is prolonged
beyond clinically indicated durations
(i.e., prolonged dialysate collections)
Serial sample collections can be done while patients are
awake and in the course of standard clinical care
Catheter calibration is needed to estimate the true
drug concentration in tissue
Safe with low rates of bleeding or infections
(comparable to other intracerebral monitoring techniques)
Sensitive analytical methods are needed to detect drug
concentrations in the dialysate samples
More than one catheter can be placed at one time, enabling
concurrent measurement in tumor core, peritumoral tissue
and normal brain
In vitro testing is required to determine if the drug of interest
is a candidate for microdialysis; many new targeted therapies
and large proteins will not be good candidates
Accuracy of catheter placement can be confirmed with
imaging studies
Accurate placement of catheter into regions of tumor
is challenging

The major advantages and limitations of the microdialysis technique for clinical translational studies in neuro-oncology.