Table 1.
Biased Homoeologs in the In Silico Hybrid, Reciprocal F1 Hybrids, and Tetraploids.
| Expression in Parentsa | Expression in Hybrids/Tetraploids | N9 | 9N | NN99 | 99NN | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N = 9 | N = 9 | Parental condition | 4503 (38.79%) | 4545 (39.15%) | 3023 (26.04%) | 3063 (26.39%) |
| N > 9 | N > 9 | Parental condition | 1297 (11.17%) | 1249 (10.76%) | 1322 (11.39%) | 1253 (10.79%) |
| N < 9 | N < 9 | Parental condition | 951 (8.19%) | 952 (8.20%) | 1357 (11.69%) | 1497 (12.90%) |
| N > 9 | N = 9 | No bias in hybrids/tetraploids | 1321 (11.38%) | 1368 (11.78%) | 891 (7.68%) | 933 (8.04%) |
| N < 9 | N = 9 | No bias in hybrids/tetraploids | 1807 (15.57%) | 1797 (15.48%) | 978 (8.43%) | 952 (8.20%) |
| N = 9 | N > 9 | Novel bias in hybrids/tetraploids | 801 (6.90%) | 776 (6.69%) | 1403 (12.09%) | 1184 (10.20%) |
| N = 9 | N < 9 | Novel bias in hybrids/tetraploids | 481 (4.14%) | 464 (4.00%) | 1359 (11.71%) | 1538 (13.25%) |
| N > 9 | N < 9 | Opposite bias in hybrids/tetraploids | 147 (1.27%) | 148 (1.27%) | 552 (4.76%) | 579 (4.99%) |
| N < 9 | N > 9 | Opposite bias in hybrids/tetraploids | 300 (2.58%) | 309 (2.66%) | 723 (6.23%) | 609 (5.25%) |
Note.—N = 9 denotes equal expression; N > 9 and N < 9 denote Nipponbare-biased and 93-11-biased expression, respectively.
aBased on the homoeolog expression bias test in the in silico hybrid.