Table 1. Statistical differences in compared profiles.

Compared profiles (referencevs. comparison)	rms analysis				Amplitude–frequency spectrum analyses
[m/s2]	[t(38), p values]				[df = 1, p values]
	Total Noise		Stochastic Noise		Total Noise		Stochastic Noise
	up	down	up	down	up	down	up	down
0.07 vs. 0.03	<0.001	<0.001	0.47	0.68	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	0.06
0.07 vs. 0.11	<0.001	<0.001	0.66	0.11	<0.001	<0.001	0.03	<0.001
0.3 vs. 0.12	<0.001	<0.001	0.05	0.02	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001
0.3 vs. 0.48	<0.001	<0.001	0.18	0.002	<0.001	<0.001	0.02	<0.001
1.1 vs. 0.68	<0.001	<0.001	0.39	0.57	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001
1.1 vs. 1.52	<0.001	<0.001	0.98	0.38	<0.001	<0.001	0.11	0.002
1.6 vs. 1.14	<0.001	0.005	0.36	0.06	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001
1.6 vs. 2.06	<0.001	<0.001	0.38	0.19	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001
2 vs. 1.5	<0.001	<0.001	0.08	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001
2 vs. 2.5	0.12	<0.001	0.21	0.01	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001

P-values resulting from the two analyses comparing the levels of total and stochastic noise around each reference for both upward (up) and downward (down) movements. Effects with a p-value <0.05 are considered as significant and appear in bold.