Table 2.
Studies on in vivo bioactivity (bone-bonding responses) hydraulic calcium silicate cements following intraosseous implantation.
Reference | Material investigated |
Animal model |
Surgical site |
Number of intra-osseous implants |
Time period (days) |
Delivery Method |
Results |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
New bone apposition in direct contact with material Number (%) |
New bone separated from material by fibrous connective tissue Number (%) |
Mixed (incomplete direct bone contact) Number (%) |
|||||||
132 | Grey MTA | Guinea pig | Mandible | 5 | 60 | Teflon cup | 1 (20%) | 4 (80%) | NA |
133 | Grey MTA | Guinea pig | Mandible | 10 | 70 | Teflon cup | 1 (10%) | 9 (90%) | 0 (0%) |
Tibia | 11 | 80 | 5 (45.45%) | 5 (45.45%) | 1 (9.1%) | ||||
134 | Grey MTA | Rat | Parietal bone | 20 | 15 | Freshly mixed; direct placement | 0 (0%)a | 20 (100%)c | 0 (0%)b |
18 | 30 | 0 (0%)a | 14 (77.8%)c | 4 (22.2%)b | |||||
18 | 60 | 2 (11.2%)a | 8 (44.4%)c | 8 (44.4%)b | |||||
135 | Grey MTA | Guinea pig | Mandible | 13 | 14 | Teflon cup | 8 (81.5%) | 5 (38.5%) | NA |
13 | 84 | 7 (53.8%) | 6 (46.2%) | ||||||
Portland cement | 13 | 14 | 7 (53.8%) | 6 (46.2%) | |||||
13 | 84 | 10 (76.9%) | 3 (23.1%) | ||||||
136 | Grey MTA | Guinea pig | Mandible | 10 | 28 | Teflon cup | Unspecified specimen numbers–fibrous capsule (absent/slight), new bone in close contact with material (extensive) for both time periods. Negative control (empty Teflon cup)–thin fibrous capsule for both time periods. | ||
12 | 84 | ||||||||
137d | Grey MTA | Rat | Femur | 15 | 7 | Freshly mixed; direct placement | 15 (100%)c | ||
15 | 28 | 15 (100%)b | |||||||
15 | 56 | 15 (100%)a |
Defined as extensive (complete coverage or "bridging" of the material surface with bone).
Defined as moderate (at least 50% of the material surface partially covered with bone).
Defined as slight (occasional islands of osteogenesis over the material surface; less than 25% of the material surface covered with bone).
Results questionable - negative control groups (no material placement in implant cavity) for each time period exhibited the same results as the experimental groups.