Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 22;9(4):e95828. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095828

Table 1. Values of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, positive and negative likelihood ratios for Adapted Scoring System (ASS), Modified Scoring System (MSS) and Scoring System with New Score (SSNS) according to the cut-off values (with the optimized cutoff value marked in “bold-face”), for HIV-infected adults and suspected smear-negative pulmonary TB, in Pernambuco, Brazil, 2007–2010.

Number of points Sensitivity Specificity Predictive value Likelihood Ratio
Positive Negative Positive Negative
Adapted Scoring System (ASS)
≥ −5 100% 0% 10.04% 1.000
≥0 96.09% 10.5% 10.70% 96.01% 1.074 0.370
≥5 92.97% 15.34% 10.91% 95.13% 1.098 0.458
≥10 92.97% 19.35% 11.40% 96.10% 1.153 0.363
≥15 79.69% 48.56% 14.74% 95.54% 1.549 0.418
 ≥20 60.94% 64.69% 16.15% 93.68% 1.726 0.604
≥25 53.13% 77.24% 20.66% 93.65% 2.335 0.607
≥30 48.44% 82.82% 23.93% 93.50% 2.820 0.622
≥35 24.22% 92.94% 27.68% 91.65% 3.429 0.815
≥40 11.72% 95.82% 23.83% 90.67% 2.800 0.921
≥45 3.13% 99.13% 28.64% 90.17% 3.584 0.977
≥50 0% 100% 89.96% 1.000
Modified Scoring System (MSS)
≥ −5 100% 0% 10.04% 1.000
≥0 96.09% 9.85% 10.63% 95.76% 1.066 0.396
≥5 93.75% 14.30% 10.88% 95.34% 1.094 0.437
≥10 93.75% 17.96% 11.31% 96.26% 1.143 0.348
≥15 86.72% 42.81% 14.47% 96.65% 1.516 0.310
≥20 76.56% 55.54% 16.12% 95.50% 1.722 0.422
≥25 72.66% 66.61% 19.54% 95.62% 2.176 0.410
30 66.41% 75.68% 23.35% 95.28% 2.730 0.444
≥35 42.19% 87.62% 27.55% 93.14% 3.408 0.660
≥40 31.25% 91.98% 30.30% 92.30% 3.896 0.747
≥45 19.53% 96.34% 37.32% 91.47% 5.334 0.835
≥50 10.16% 98.95% 51.92% 90.80% 9.708 0.908
≥55 4.69% 99.30% 42.78% 90.32% 6.721 0.960
≥60 3.13% 99.83% 67.26% 90.22% 17.922 0.970
>60 0% 100% 89.96% 1.000
Scoring System with New Scores (SSNS)
≥0 100% 0% 10.04% 1.000
≥5 100% 0% 10.04% 1.000 0.000
≥10 100% 0.09% 10.05% 100% 1.001 0.000
≥15 99.22% 17.35% 11.81% 99.50% 1.200 0.045
≥20 99.22% 17.70% 11.86% 99.51% 1.205 0.044
≥25 97.66% 32.35% 13.87% 99.20% 1.443 0.072
≥30 94.53% 55.01% 19.00% 98.90% 2.101 0.099
≥35 87.50% 71.40% 25.45% 98.08% 3.060 0.175
 ≥40 81.25% 78.03% 29.21% 97.39% 3.698 0.240
≥45 67.97% 85.44% 34.25% 95.98% 4.668 0.375
≥50 60.16% 90.50% 41.41% 95.32% 6.330 0.440
≥55 50.78% 95.03% 53.27% 94.54% 10.219 0.518
≥60 37.50% 97.73% 64.83% 93.34% 16.543 0.639
≥65 23.44% 98.95% 71.36% 92.05% 22.402 0.774
≥70 14.06% 99.48% 75.11% 91.21% 26.883 0.864
≥75 5.47% 99.91% 87.15% 90.45% 62.729 0.946
≥80 3.91% 100% 100% 90.31% 44.806 0.962
>80 0% 100% 89.96% 1.000

Sample size = 1276 individuals.