Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 3;12:58. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-12-58

Table 1.

Overview of patients enrolled within the clinical trial

Total LSCD
No. AGE SEX LSCD etiology Type Follow-up (months) VA before VA after Tx Post LEC TX Result
1
44
M
Chemical burn
allo* auto
41
CF (0.014)
CF (0.014)
PK
Failed
2
45
F
Chemical burn
auto
43
HM (0.005)
0,05
-
AS, FS
4
45
M
Chemical burn
auto
31
CF (0.014)
<0,05
-
Failed
5
6
M
Chemical burn
auto
31
HM (0.005)
LP (0)
PK
Failed
6
27
M
Aniridia
allo**
27
0.053
0.1
PK
AS, FS
7
70
F
Corneal ulcer
auto
25
LP (0)
HM (0.005)
PK
AS, FS
8
29
M
Chemical burn
auto
25
<0,05
HM (0.005)
-
Failed
10
33
M
Chemical burn
auto
19
LP (0)
LP (0)
-
Failed
11
63
M
Iatrogenic
auto
19
HM (0.005)
HM (0.005)
-
AS
13
31
F
Aniridia
allo**
48
CF (0.014)
0.2
PK
AS, FS
14
16
F
Kniest syndrome
auto
6
LP (0)
HM (0.005)
-
AS
15
6
M
Keratitis
auto
5
LP (0)
LP (0)
-
Failed
16
48
M
Chemical burn
auto
4
CF (0.014)
0.125
-
AS, FS
17
79
M
Trauma
auto
4
CF (0.014)
CF (0.014)
-
AS
18
42
F
Viral keratitis
auto
18
LP (0)
HM (0.005)
PK
AS, FS
Partial LSCD
No.
AGE
SEX
LSCD Etiology
Type
Follow-up (months)
VA before
VA after
Tx Post LEC TX
Result
3
57
F
Iatrogenic
auto
39
0.15
0,16
-
AS, FS
9
44
F
Keratitis, uveitis
auto
24
CF (0.014)
0.15
PK
AS, FS
12 47 M Trauma auto 18 0.2 0.9 - AS, FS

The table shows the subject code, age, sex, etiology of LCSD (Limbal Stem Cell Deficency), type of donor (allo* = allogenic cadaveric, allo** = from living related donor), the follow-up, visual acuities pre and post op (LP = light perception, CF = counting fingers, HM = hand movements) surgical interventions following LEC TX (Limbal epithelial cell transplant) particularly PK (penetrating keratoplasty) procedures and the vision at most recent follow-up (AS = anatomical success, FS = functional success).