Table 2.
Muscle composition outcomes for eccentric and traditional resistance training groups.
| Eccentric group (n = 39) | Traditional group (n = 38) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pretraining | Posttraining | Nine-month follow-up | Within-group change | Pretraining | Posttraining | Nine-month follow-up | Within-group change | |
| IMAT (cm2) | 29.53 (8.3) | 29.56 (7.8) | 29.33 (8.8) | P = 0.92 | 32.11 (11.4) | 31.75 (10.2) | 32.41 (9.3) | P = 0.64 |
| Lean (cm2) | 181.8 (34.2) | 183.9 (34.1) | 181.6 (31.2) | P = 0.32 | 193.1 (48.7) | 193.9 (48.2) | 188.6 (46.8) | P = 0.007 |
Eccentric group: participants who participated in eccentric resistance training as part of multimodal exercise program; traditional group: participants who participated in traditional resistance training as part of multimodal exercise program; lean: lean tissue cross-sectional area of mid-thigh; IMAT: intermuscular adipose tissue cross-sectional area of mid-thigh.