Table 2. MiHAs detected in both subjects and coded by loci harbouring ns-SNPs.
MiHA name | Detected MiHA sequence | Gene symbol | HLA allele | IC50 (nM) | aa sub.1 | aa sub.2 | Alternative MiHA variant | IC50 (nM) | IC50 ratio | dbSNP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(A) | ||||||||||
MCPH1-1R | EEINLQRNI | MCPH1 | B*44:03 | 503 | RR | RI | EEINLQINI | 212 | 0.4 | rs2083914 |
MDM1-1I | VIQERVHSL | MDM1 | B*08:01 | 61 | IT | II | VTQERVHSL | 401 | 6.6 | rs962976 |
FAM82B-1K | VMGNPGTFK | FAM82B | A*03:01 | 23 | KN | KK | VMGNPGTFN | 15,374 | 668 | rs6980476 |
(B) | ||||||||||
TMEM132A-1A | AAADRVGPAA | TMEM132A | C*16:01 | 1,236 | AP | AP | AAADRVGPPA | 1,203 | 1 | — |
MAGEF1-1A | ALAAKALAR | MAGEF1 | A*03:01 | 136 | AS | AS | ALAAKSLAR | 109 | 0.8 | rs10937187 |
TRIP11-1K | DVQKKLMSL | TRIP11 | B*08:01 | 216 | KN | KN | DVQNKLMSL | 534 | 2.5 | rs145868557 |
IMMT-1S | KQSASQLQK | IMMT | A*03:01 | 65 | SP | SP | KQPASQLQK | 421 | 6.5 | rs1050301 |
DLGAP5-1H | KTYHVTPMTPR | DLGAP5 | A*03:01 | 27 | HQ | HQ | KTYQVTPMTPR | 48 | 1.8 | rs8010791 |
ZWINT-1R | QELDGVFQKL | ZWINT | B*44:03 | 366 | RG | RG | QELDRVFQKL* | 197 | 0.5 | rs2241666 |
MIIP-1K | SEESAVPKRSW | MIIP | B*44:03 | 235 | KE | KE | SEESAVPERSW | 245 | 1.0 | rs2295283 |
For some MiHAs, one subject was homozygous and one subject heterozygous at the MiHA locus (A), whereas for other MiHAs both subjects were heterozygous at the MiHA locus (B). Selected features of the MiHAs are shown: the detected amino-acid sequence (polymorphic residues are highlighted in bold underlined), the source gene, the HLA molecule for which the MiHA has the best predicted binding affinity (IC50), the translated genotype of the polymorphic loci shown in amino acids (aa) for each subject, the alternative MiHA variant and its predicted HLA-binding affinity (IC50), the differential predicted HLA-binding affinity of the variant relative to the detected sequence (IC50 ratio) and the dbSNP identification when the ns-SNP corresponds to a known SNP. IC50 values of the alternative MiHA variants and IC50 ratios are shown in italics when they show a fold difference ≥2 relative to the detected MiHAs. Further features can be found in Supplementary Data 3.
*The alternative MiHA variant was detected by MS.