Skip to main content
. 2014 May 22;281(1783):20140077. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0077

Table 1.

Coefficient estimates and significance of parameters in best-fit models predicting GI and ectoparasitism (ECTO) in zebras. Coefficient s.e., Wald Z-test statistics, p-values and effect sizes (with 95% CIs) are reported. Maximum cluster size was 5 for both models.

response coefficients estimate s.e. z-value p(>|z|) effect size
GIa (intercept) 3.718 0.119 927.09 <2 × 10−16***
season (wet) 0.201 0.057 12.54 4.0 × 10−4*** 1.22 (1.09–1.37)
sex (male) 0.126 0.102 1.52 0.218 1.13 (0.93–1.39)
age –0.011 0.008 1.65 0.199 0.99 (0.97–1.00)
SNPs 0.039 0.032 1.52 0.217 1.04 (0.98–1.11)
common (presence) 0.104 0.090 1.33 0.249 1.11 (0.93–1.32)
rare (presence) 0.150 0.042 12.71 3.6 × 10−4*** 1.16 (1.07–1.26)
SNPs × common –0.078 0.036 4.82 0.028* 0.92 (0.86–0.99)
ECTO (intercept) 1.179 0.271 18.95 1.3 × 10−5***
season (wet) –0.191 0.101 3.58 0.059 0.83 (0.68–1.01)
sex (male) –0.046 0.173 0.07 0.789 0.96 (0.68–1.34)
age 0.021 0.026 0.65 0.422 1.02 (0.97–1.07)
common (presence) 0.344 0.172 4.02 0.045* 1.41 (1.01–1.98)
mid (presence) –0.019 0.175 0.01 0.913 0.98 (0.70–1.38)
rare (presence) 0.056 0.173 0.10 0.748 1.06 (0.75–1.48)

aResponse variable for GI parasitism was square-root transformed.

*p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001.