Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 19;8(5):963–978. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2013.217

Table 2. Electricity generating profile under SP operation with three controlled anode potentials.

  SP-H SP-M SP-L
Anode potential (vs SHE) +100 mV
–50 mV
–200 mV
Reactor ID a b a b a b
Phase I (day 55–75)
 Current (mA)a 32.2 31.2 16.2 21.1 6.9 2.5
  ±s.d. ±3.5 ±2.6 ±1.0 ±4.2 ±1.8 ±1.0
 Current density (mA cm−2)b 0.325 0.315 0.163 0.213 0.069 0.026
  ±s.d. ±0.035 ±0.026 ±0.010 ±0.042 ±0.018 ±0.010
 Max. current density (mA cm−2)b,c 0.270 0.305 0.215 0.323 0.219 0.027
 CE (%)d 50 46 40 41 28 12
  ±s.d. ±5 ±4 ±4 ±4 ±5 ±6
             
Phase II (day 135–155)
 Current (mA)a 24.2 19.9 20.0 21.7 7.0 3.5
  ±s.d. ±2.9 ±1.4 ±2.0 ±1.0 ±1.0 ±0.7
 Current density (mA cm−2)b 0.260 0.214 0.215 0.233 0.075 0.038
  ±s.d. ±0.031 ±0.015 ±0.022 ±0.011 ±0.011 ±0.008
 Max. current density (mA cm−2)b,c 0.297 0.246 0.297 0.358 0.235 0.044
 CE (%)d 43 41 43 40 35 21
  ±s.d. ±3 ±3 ±2 ±3 ±4 ±0

Abbreviations: CE, coulombic efficiency; SP, set-potential.

a

Averaged maximum current generation for repeated batch exchanges during SP operation.

b

Current density was calculated per projected anode surface area.

c

Maximum current density was determined by linear sweep voltammetry at day 62 (2-month) and at day 152 (5-month).

d

CE was calculated for each batch under SP operation, and averaged during the periods (phases I and II).