Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 2;2014:852645. doi: 10.1155/2014/852645

Table 3.

Comparison of evaluation reports of various RDTs done in the recent years.

Dipstick Standard Population Sensitivity
(%)
Specificity
(%)
Reference
CareStart (Access Bio, Princeton, NJ, USA) GTTS* Southwestern Uganda 95.6 91.5 [154]
Vistapan (Mitra, New Delhi, India) 91.9 89.6
Parabank ( Orchid/Zephyr, Goa, India) 84.7 94.3
Paracheck pf (Orchid/Zephyr, Goa, India) 94 87.3
Optimal-IT (DiaMed, Cressier, Switzerland) GTS** Gabon
Children under
11 years
94 97 [155]
Acon (Acon Labs, San Diego, CA, USA) 94 90
PALUTOP+4 (ALL.DIAG, Strasbourg, France) GTTS* and PCR Madagascar 95.4 97.1 [156]
Optimal-IT (DiaMed, Cressier, Switzerland) 75.8 99.0
ParaHIT f test (Span Diagnostic Ltd., Surat, India) GTTS* and PCR Tanzania 69.2 100 [157]
Malaria Pf GTTS* Uganda 98 72 [135]
Paracheck Pf (Orchid Biomedical Systems, Goa, India) GTTS* Kenya 91.7 96.7 [158]
Malar-Check_Pf test GTS** Brazil 97.4% 88.5% [159]
Makromed Dipstick Assay PCR Canada 97.0% 96.0% [160]
ParaSight-F (Becton Dickinson, USA) Thin blood smears and Quantitative
Buffy Coat malaria test
France 94% 99% [161]
ParaSight-F (Becton Dickinson, USA) Microscopy Iquitos, Peru, and Maesod, Thailand 95% 86% [162]
Paracheck Pf (Orchid Biomedical Systems) Microscopy India 93% 84% [163]
ParaHIT-f (Span Diagnostics) GTS** Tanzania 90.7% 73.5% [164]
ParaHIT-f (Span Diagnostics) Microscopy India 87.5% 97% [163]

**Giemsa thick smear.

*Giemsa thick and thin smear.