Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 16;8:206. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00206

Table 3.

ERP-Behavior correlations across flanker and tongue twister tasks*+.

Tongue twister effect (TT non-TT)
Tongue twister overal
Tongue twister ERP
Flanker ERP
Error proportion Item ordering errors Phoneme ordering errors Self corrections Overall error proportion Item ordering errors Phoneme ordering errors Self corrections TT non-TT stimulus locked TT ERN         N2          ERN
Flanker ERP N2 -0.03 -0.10 0.01 0.04 0.10 -0.11 0.10 -0.15 0.15 0.04 0.42
ERN -0.29 -0.25 -0.08 0.12 -0.05 0.00 -0.25 -0.22 -0.02 -0.17
Flanker behavior Congruency RT -0.11 -0.12 -0.11 0.44 0.12 -0.13 0.19 0.12 0.01 0.04
Congruency Error Rate 0.11 0.30 -0.19 -0.02 0.13 -0.02 0.22 0.07 0.04 0.25 0.16 -0.04
Average RT 0.06 0.00 0.05 0.04 0.18 0.14 0.03 -0.12 -0.12 0.03 0.13 0.01
Average Error Rate 0.12 0.29 -0.18 -0.02 0.12 0.00 0.19 0.06 0.04 0.25 0.07 -0.02
TT ERP TT non-TT Stimulus Locked -0.27 -0.09 -0.32 -0.22 0.10 0.08 -0.01 -0.25
ERN 0.31 0.37 0.24 0.01 0.23 0.18 0.23 0.12 -0.07
*

Bold font indicates correlations with p <0.05; Italic indicates p <0.10 (all effects uncorrected for multiple comparisons)

+

N = 44 for Flanker effects; N = 40 for tongue twister effects; N = 30 for the tongue twister ERN.