Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 23.
Published in final edited form as: J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2014 Jan;14(1):15–56. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2014.9127

Table II.

Natural polymer used for scaffold fabrication and their properties.

Natural polymer Study Porosity (%) Pore size (μm) Compressive stress (MPa) (CS), Work-of-fracture (J/m2) (WOF), Flexural strength (MPa) (FS), Matrix stiffness (Pa) (MS) Tangent modulus (kPa) (TM), Elastic modulus (Pa) (EM), Compressive modulus (kPa) (CM), Linear modulus (kPa) (LM), Modulus of resilience (kPa) (MR), Shear modulus (Pa) (SM) Ref.
Gelatin/chitooligosaccharide In vitro/in vivo 70–105 [300]
Collagen In vitro/in vivo 296.5 ± 107.5 to (0 to 5)% strain-TM 74.5 ± 18.4-MR [254]
Chitosan In vivo 85 ± 2 70–900 [301]
Chitosan/collagen/beta-glycerophosphate (β-GP) In vitro 3–4 3 times more stiffer than pure chitosan to (0–8)% strain-LM [302]
Silk fibroin In vitro (lamellar) 250–500 (spherical) 500–1000 [303]
Silk fibroin In vitro/in vivo 85 ± 5 10–250 25.69 ± 1.61-CM [304]
Alginate/CPC/hUCMSC In vitro 4-FS > 400-WOF 0.7 GPa-EM [305]
Alginate In vitro ~ 200 [306]
Hyaluronic acid In vitro 21-CM [307]
Hyaluronic acid In vitro/in vivo 2520 ± 30–2600 ± 30-EM [308]
RAD16-I BD™ (PuraMatrix) In vitro 100-MS 9500-SM [309]
Chitosan/RGD peptides In vitro 110–149 9.81 ± 0.738-CS [310]