Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 11;171(9):2251–2268. doi: 10.1111/bph.12628

Table 1.

Comparator overview of some of the major properties of mephedrone and MDMA

Behavioural measurements Mephedrone MDMA
Locomotor activity(1–3)2010
• Duration ↑↑
• Magnitude
• 5-HT syndrome
• Sensitization to same drug
Body temperature(4–6)2010
• Singly housed ↓↓
• Group housed ↑↑
• High-ambient temperature ↔↑§2010 ↑↑↑
Drug self-administration(6)2010 ↑↑↑
Chemical measurements
Pharmacokinetics(7,8)
• Plasma half-life (h) ∼0.4 ∼0.8
• Half-life similar to humans Χ
• Active metabolites ?
• Brain penetration ↑↑
Brain monoamine release in vivo(9–11)2010
• 5-HT ↑↑↑ ↑↑↑
• Dopamine ↑↑
Brain monoamine content at 60 min(12–13)
• 5-HT ↓↓↓
• Dopamine
Brain neurotoxicity(14–16)2010
• 5-HT in rats ?*2010
• Dopamine in mice
Monoamine uptake inhibition (IC50)(18,19)
• SERT 422 125
• DAT 762 1009
• NET 487 450
Monoamine release (EC50)(20–22)2010
• SERT 122 39
• DAT 51 42
• NET 58 53

Data compiled to compare the behavioural effects and pharmacokinetic measurements were derived from studies using a single acute s.c. or i.p. injection of either drug (typically 1–10 mg·kg−1 but up to 30 mg·kg−1 for mephedrone) in rats and where available in mice, but in some microdialysis studies i.v. administration was used. Studies examining a neurotoxic effect have used multiple doses (either on the same day or over a few weeks) typically administering 10–30 mg·kg−1 s.c. or i.p. Arrows show relative size of behavioural response, either increase (↑) or decrease (↓), ↔ indicates no significant change from control. Check mark (✓) shows that a response or change occurs, dash (−) means change not seen, and X means the value is different from humans. IC50 and EC50 values are both reported in nM and taken from Baumann et al. (2013a).

*

Indicates that one of five studies reported neurotoxic damage. Combinations of other drugs with either MDMA or mephedrone and have been reported to, respectively, enhance or induce toxicity as detailed in the text.

§

Indicates conflicting results. Key references supporting the synopsis for each parameter are indicated as a numerical superscript and below, but further references are provided in the relevant section of the review: 1Kehr et al. (2011), 2Lisek et al. (2012), 3Green et al. (2003), 4Shortall et al. (2013a, b,), 5Miller et al. (2013), 6Docherty and Green (2010), 7Baumann et al. (2009), 8Martínez-Clemente et al. (2013), 9Kehr et al. (2011), 10Wright et al. (2012a), 11O'Shea et al. (2005), 12Motbey et al. (2012a), 13Colado and Green (1994), 14Shortall et al. (2013a, c,), 15Motbey et al. (2012a), 16Green et al. (2003), 17Hadlock et al. (2011), 18Martínez-Clemente et al. (2012), 19Baumann et al. (2013a), 20Nagai et al. (2007), 21Baumann et al. (2011), 22Simmler et al. (2013).