Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 25;4(7):944–958. doi: 10.1002/ece3.989

Table 2.

Effect of percentage of missing data on the MRdAE (median relative absolute error) for the four methods applied to the two subdatabases. For each method, a one-way Kruskal–Wallis test was conducted to test the effect of the percentage of missing data on the MRdAE. The P values are presented in the table for each method and each trait

Traits
Methods H LDMC LM LS RH SM SNP SS SLA
Whole subdatabase
 Average 0.55 0.44 0.24 0.11 0.34 0.38 0.06 0.48 0.38
 Median 0.72 0.22 0.42 0.97 0.33 0.55 0.01 0.66 0.37
 MICE 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.53 0.01 0.00
 Dissimilarity 0.46 0.87 0.00 0.11 0.25 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00
 Relationships 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.00
Herbaceous subdatabase
 Average 0.69 0.55 0.07 0.07 0.47 0.32 0.01 0.80 0.95
 Median 0.89 0.03 0.00 0.19 0.20 0.01 0.00 0.46 0.89
 MICE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.36 1.00 0.01 0.00
 Dissimilarity 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.07
 Relationships 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.39 0.16

H, vegetative height; LDMC, leaf dry matter content; LM, leaf mass; LS, leaf surface; MICE, Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations; RH, reproductive height; SM, seed mass; SNP, seeds number per plant; SS, seed shape; SLA, specific leaf area.

Significant P values (P < 0.05) are in bold.