Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 23;9(4):e95317. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095317

Figure 3. All trace-paired conditioned mice learned the WTEB conditioning task, in contrast to their respectively yoked unpaired-conditioned mice.

Figure 3

(A) Mean percent conditioned response (CR) (±SEM) for ACQ mice each session until ACQ criterion (C-1  =  day of ACQ criterion; C-2  =  day before ACQ criterion. (B) Mean percent conditioned response (CR) (±SEM) for LRD mice each session until LRD criterion (C =  day of LRD criterion; C-1  =  day before LRD criterion; C-2  =  two-days before LRD criterion). (C) Mean percent conditioned response (CR) (±SEM) for OT mice each session until OT criterion (C+1  =  day of OT criterion; C =  day before OT criterion; C-1  =  two-days before OT criterion; C-2  =  three-days before OT criterion). All trace-paired conditioned mice (ACQ, LRD and OT) exhibited a significant increase in WTEB conditioning performance compared to unpaired-conditioned mice, and in comparison to their baseline performance. *p<0.05.