Table 1.
Cell Type | rmax | i0.5 | tp | Ti | λmax | %A1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hatchling | ||||||
M Rod | 17±9, 2 | 3±1, 2 | 631, 1 | 1459, 1 | 512±4, 2 | 50±25, 2 |
S Rod | 4, 1 | 11, 1 | 530, 1 | 428, 1 | 94, 1 | |
UV Cone | 4±1, 7 | 291±119, 8 | 112±27, 2 | 135±53, 2 | 361* | 100* |
S Cone | 3±0.4, 8 | 59±11, 7 | 674±100, 2 | 429±0, 4 | 82±10, 4 | |
L Cone Single | 4±1, 4 | 602±160, 4 | 181±34, 2 | 494±46, 2 | 563±0.2, 5 | 92±1, 5 |
Larval | ||||||
M Rod | 31±3, 18 | 4±0.5, 17 | 610±19, 9 | 1470±76, 9 | 516±3, 9 | 28±8, 9 |
S Rod | 11±1, 22 | 51±9, 26 | 310±18, 21 | 686±55, 21 | 431±1, 17 | 43±8, 17 |
UV Cone | 4±0.5, 11 | 1344±295, 9 | 109±9, 7 | 210±26, 6 | 361* | 100* |
S Cone | 6±1, 10 | 349±57, 14 | 301±24, 10 | 759±86, 10 | 434±1, 6 | 23±13, 7 |
L Cone Single | 8±1, 11 | 959±163, 13 | 169±16, 6 | 512±119, 6 | 584±4, 12 | 49±5, 12 |
L Cone Double | 10±1, 24 | 1098±129, 24 | 188±15, 9 | 534±66, 9 | 586±2, 25 | 51±3, 24 |
Terrestrial | ||||||
M Rod | 27±2, 2 | 3±1, 2 | 592, 1 | 505±2, 2 | 82±10, 2 | |
S Rod | 16±2, 12 | 17±5, 9 | 529±61, 8 | 1405±165, 8 | 429±1, 12 | 73±10, 12 |
UV Cone | 8±1, 3 | 701±370, 3 | 299±93, 3 | 545±369, 2 | 361* | 100* |
L Cone Single | 5±1, 4 | 1812±551, 4 | 184±39, 3 | 380±161, 3 | 568±4, 3 | 73±12, 3 |
L Cone Double | 7±1, 5 | 383±78, 5 | 242, 1 | 481, 1 | 576±3, 5 | 64±3, 3 |
Values given as mean ± SEM, number of cells analyzed. rmax, is the maximal response amplitude. i0.5, is the flash strength at the λmax that elicited a half maximal response. Kinetics of the single photon response were determined from dim flash responses whose mean amplitudes were less than or equal to 0.15rmax. The time-to-peak, tp, was measured from mid-flash to the peak of the response. The integration time, Ti, was calculated as the integral of the dim flash response divided by the response amplitude. Values for λmax were taken from fits of spectral sensitivity with eq. 1 (see Methods).
for UV cones, the sensitivity maximum was set to 361 nm and the %A1 was assigned to be 100% (see Methods).