Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 21;14:22. doi: 10.1186/1472-6750-14-22

Table 4.

Lag-phase prediction results and Q 2 values of the PLS-2CV models shown in Table3

PLS-2CV Lag-phase Prediction
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5 Model 6
Bag-CA
 7.5
 6.13
 9.28
 7.43
 5.79
 6.18
 4.96
Bag-DA
 6.0
 3.36
 5.24
 4.61
 6.79
 4.95
 5.53
Bag-MA
 2.0
 5.02
 3.55
 4.27
 4.21
 3.08
 2.90
BS-CA
 7.5
 7.14
 7.67
 7.45
 7.42
 9.28
 8.44
BS-DA
 6.5
 8.99
 5.29
 8.23
 9.49
 6.57
 7.71
BS-PAA
 3.0
 3.61
 4.12
 3.82
 3.86
 4.67
 3.86
CS-CA
 10.5
 11.71
 9.44
 10.91
 10.32
 10.61
 11.33
CS-MA
 6.5
 −6.10
 6.28
 −1.36
 4.40
 6.66
 6.25
Oak-CA
 1.5
 4.25
 4.48
 4.43
 6.27
 6.02
 6.19
Oak-DA
 5.0
 4.42
 5.70
 4.74
 6.16
 5.94
 5.81
Oak-MA
 2.5
 3.81
 4.00
 3.99
 −3.28
 2.00
 −0.54
Oak-PAA
 3.0
 5.39
 4.38
 5.05
 3.47
 2.99
 2.55
Willow-DA
 7.5
 6.83
 8.95
 7.61
 5.19
 6.70
 6.68
Willow-PAA
 5.5
 3.61
 6.08
 4.36
 7.12
 2.19
 4.51
WS-CA
 9.0
 7.93
 8.17
 8.00
 6.95
 6.86
 6.18
WS-MA
 6.5
 6.58
 2.01
 3.97
 4.38
 7.95
 7.59
Q2   −1.01 0.54 0.06 0.05 0.51 0.47

Bold: models selected for analyzing the SR of the peaks in the data-sets.